Site icon swarb.co.uk

Morris and Others v Agrichemicals Ltd and Others: CA 20 Dec 1995

No mandatory set off on liquidation without the requirement for mutuality. The Court accepted a proposition that a chargeback arrangement was inefficiency, no implication followed as to the recourse against the Depositor of a collateral security.

Citations:

Times 08-Jan-1996

Statutes:

Insolvency Rules 1986 4.90

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedTam Wing Chuen v Bank of Credit and Commerce Hong Kong Ltd PC 1996
The Board considered a banking transaction and the application of a chargeback by the bank, under which a loan was made only after a deposit by a third party against which it was secured, and particularly in the context of the insolvency of the bank . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency

Updated: 15 May 2022; Ref: scu.83841

Exit mobile version