EAT RACE DISCRIMINATION: Direct / Burden of proof
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Appellate jurisdiction/reasons/Burns-Barke
Numerous complaints of direct discrimination/victimisation under the Race Relations Act 1976 (RRA). Whether the Employment Tribunal reasoning passed the Meek test. With one exception it did not; those matters remitted to fresh Employment Tribunal for rehearing.
On the question, does s.54A RRA apply to Direct Discrimination on ground of colour Chagger  IRLR 86 (Underhill P) affirmative answer preferred to negative answer in Okonu  ICR 598.
Peter Clarke J
 UKEAT 0003 – 09 – 0910
Not preferred – Okonu v G4S Security Services (UK) Ltd EAT 11-Feb-2007
EAT Race discrimination
The burden of proof in section 54A of the Race Relations Act 1976 does not apply to cases of direct discrimination on the grounds of nationality or colour. In such cases the less . .
Preferred – Abbey National Plc and Another v Chagger EAT 16-Oct-2008
EAT RACE DISCRIMINATION: Direct / Burden of proof / Other losses
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Delay in ET judgment
STATUTORY DISCIPLINE and GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES: Impact on compensation
C, aged 40, . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 04 August 2022; Ref: scu.375965