The respondent sought security for costs. One plaintiff was bankrupt, and an outstanding costs order had not been met.
Held: The matter should not be adjourned pending an application for legal aid, and nor should the considerable interest in the case put the respondent at risk. Security for costs ordered.
Citations:
[1997] EWCA Civ 1920, [1997] 1 WLR 967, [1997] 2 EGLR 44, [1997] 3 All ER 446, [1997] 37 EG 161, [1997] 37 EG 161, [1997] EG 29
Links:
Statutes:
Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 5
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Michaels and Michaels v Taylor Woodrow Developments Ltd, etc ChD 19-Apr-2000
The respondents sought to strike out the claim for conspiracy and failure to comply with the Act. The respondent was landlord of premises occupied by the claimants. They had served a notice under the Act of their intention to sell.
Held: The . .
Cited by:
See Also – Michaels and Michaels v Taylor Woodrow Developments Ltd, etc ChD 19-Apr-2000
The respondents sought to strike out the claim for conspiracy and failure to comply with the Act. The respondent was landlord of premises occupied by the claimants. They had served a notice under the Act of their intention to sell.
Held: The . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Landlord and Tenant, Costs
Updated: 06 November 2022; Ref: scu.142316