Site icon swarb.co.uk

Meyers v Casey; 13 Oct 1913

References: [1913] HCA 50, (1913) 17 CLR 90
Links: Austlii
Coram: Barton ACJ, Isaacs, Powers and Rich JJ
Ratio (High Court of Australia) The Court considered a decision of the committee of the Victoria Racing Club. Isaac J said of objections considered by the committee: ‘They are, by reason of the committee’s decision, res judicatae, as much as if instead of the committee it had been the Supreme Court unappealed from, that has so held. That rests on the well known rule that a competent court or other tribunal has jurisdiction to give a wrong judgment, and if there is no appeal in the strict sense, then its decision, whether right or wrong, must stand, and cannot be questioned in any subsequent proceedings elsewhere.’
This case is cited by:

(This list may be incomplete)

Last Update: 16-May-16
Ref: 428358

Exit mobile version