EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Costs
The Employment Judge did not err in principle or omit a relevant or consider an irrelevant factor when dismissing Respondents’ applications for costs when much of a sex discrimination case was struck out.
Citations:
[2008] UKEAT 0140 – 08 – 1407
Links:
Citing:
Cited – Shergold v Fieldway Medical Centre EAT 5-Dec-2005
The claimant had submitted a grievance complaining in general terms of the way in which she had been treated by a manager. She did not, however, refer to a particular incident relied on in her pleading as one of the two ‘last straw’ incidents that . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.276422