Site icon swarb.co.uk

McPartland v Pybus: EAT 11 May 1999

Whether the Applicant, was unfairly dismissed by the Respondent solicitors, for asserting a statutory right, contrary to Section 104 of the 1996 Act.T he Applicant now appealed against rejection of her claim. The Tribunal went on to find that the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages amounting to andpound;15 and awarded her that amount. Her claim for ‘ordinary unfair dismissal’ (not being for an inadmissible reason) was adjourned pending the outcome of the Seymour-Smith litigation.

Citations:

[1999] UKEAT 170 – 99 – 1105

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Employment Rights Act 1996 104

Employment

Updated: 14 June 2022; Ref: scu.205222

Exit mobile version