McGinley And Egan v The United Kingdom: ECHR 9 Jun 1998

ECHR Judgment (Merits) – Preliminary objection allowed (non-exhaustion); No violation of Art. 6-1; No violation of Art. 8; Not necessary to examine Art. 13.
23414/94, 21825/93
Human Rights
Cited by:
CitedRoche v The United Kingdom ECHR 19-Oct-2005
(Grand Chamber) The claimant had been exposed to harmful chemicals whilst in the Army at Porton Down in 1953. He had wished to claim a service pension on the basis of the ensuing personal injury, but had been frustrated by many years of the . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 24 July 2021; Ref: scu.227264