EAT CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT
Implied term /variation /construction of term
Tribunal entitled to find that evidence that the employee had undergone a conventional induction on recruitment did not constitute evidence that he had received ‘training’ at a cost of andpound;500 which the employer was entitled to recover under a claw-back clause.
 UKEAT 0061 – 08 – 0207
Updated: 04 August 2022; Ref: scu.375930