Site icon swarb.co.uk

Marlborough Hotel v Meiris: EAT 8 Sep 2006

EAT Unlawful Deduction from Wages – (no sub-topic). Practice and Procedure – Withdrawal
Practice and Procedure – Absence of party
Appellant had paid a claim to the Applicant after an agreement with the Applicant. He did not complete the ET3 because he considered the matter settled. ET not contacted by the Applicant for claim to be withdrawn. Judge Reid QC required them to see affidavit by Appellant rectifying matters. The Applicant Respondent did not appear. Appeal allowed as Applicant already received sum he agreed was owing. Appeal allowed.

Judges:

His Honour Judge Pugsley

Citations:

[2006] UKEAT 0256 – 06 – 0809, UKEAT/0256/06

Links:

Bailii, EAT

Employment

Updated: 09 July 2022; Ref: scu.247804

Exit mobile version