Site icon swarb.co.uk

Manic v Lithuania: ECHR 13 Jan 2015

The applicant alleged the passivity of the public authorities in enforcing a judicial decision defining his rights of contact with his child. He alleged, in particular, that the actions by the Lithuanian authorities and courts in respect of his right to have contact with his son were in breach of Article 8 of the Convention.

Guido Raimondi, P
46600/11 – Chamber Judgment, [2015] ECHR 20
Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights 8

Human Rights, Family

Updated: 25 December 2021; Ref: scu.541376

Exit mobile version