Skip to content

swarb.co.uk

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

  • Law
    • More Recent Cases
    • e-Legal Gathering
    • Case Layout
    • FAQ
    • Searching
    • Areas of Law
    • law index
    • Courts
    • Reports
    • Judges
    • Case Names
  • Privacy
    • GDPR – Overall
    • Anonymity Orders
    • GDPR – Request to be ‘Forgotten’
    • Privacy – Users
    • GDPR – Content
    • GDPR – Legitimate Interests
    • Lawfulness of processing
    • Purposes Limitation
    • Cookie Policy
    • GDPR -Accuracy
    • GDPR – Resources
    • California Consumer Privacy Act
  • About
    • What we do
    • Contact
    • Development
  • Advertising
    • Advertising
    • Donate
    • Statistics
  • Registration

Mamatas And Others v Greece: ECHR 21 Jul 2016

63066/14 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) : Court (First Section)) French Text, [2016] ECHR 694
Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights

Human Rights

Updated: 20 January 2022; Ref: scu.567623

Posted on January 20, 2022January 20, 2022 by dlsPosted in Human RightsTagged Human Rights

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Protec International Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 2 Dec 2010
Next Next post: Vilca and Others v Xstrata Ltd and Others: QBD 21 Jul 2016

Areas of Law:

  • Administrative (1,122)
  • Adoption (461)
  • Agency (620)
  • Agriculture (773)
  • Animals (305)
  • Arbitration (1,262)
  • Armed Forces (358)
  • Banking (1,416)
  • Benefits (3,519)
  • Capital Gains Tax (486)
  • Charity (383)
  • Child Support (309)
  • Children (5,385)
  • Civil Procedure Rules (316)
  • Commercial (1,423)
  • Commonwealth (3,082)
  • Company (3,025)
  • Constitutional (949)
  • Construction (1,171)
  • Consumer (740)
  • Contempt of Court (837)
  • Contract (6,114)
  • Coroners (421)
  • Corporation Tax (680)
  • Costs (3,550)
  • Crime (8,398)
  • Criminal Evidence (633)
  • Criminal Practice (3,315)
  • Criminal Sentencing (2,830)
  • Customs and Excise (1,686)
  • Damages (2,486)
  • Defamation (1,543)
  • Development (1)
  • Discrimination (2,630)
  • Ecclesiastical (307)
  • Education (1,063)
  • Elections (224)
  • Employment (12,722)
  • Environment (820)
  • Equity (961)
  • Estoppel (334)
  • European (12,954)
  • Evidence (517)
  • Extradition (1,589)
  • Family (2,883)
  • Financial Services (1,014)
  • Health (1,522)
  • Health and Safety (459)
  • Health Professions (1,928)
  • Housing (2,003)
  • Human Rights (19,659)
  • Immigration (56,354)
  • Income Tax (3,224)
  • Information (15,624)
  • Inheritance Tax (178)
  • Insolvency (3,044)
  • Insurance (1,249)
  • Intellectual Property (13,534)
  • International (956)
  • Ireland (18)
  • Judicial Review (584)
  • Jurisdiction (1,047)
  • Jury (1,771)
  • Land (5,293)
  • Landlord and Tenant (15,657)
  • Legal Aid (391)
  • Legal Professions (1,957)
  • Licensing (594)
  • Limitation (1,064)
  • Litigation Practice (7,051)
  • Local Government (1,630)
  • Magistrates (758)
  • Media (1,141)
  • Natural Justice (322)
  • Negligence (1,336)
  • News (49)
  • Northern Ireland (1,758)
  • Nuisance (460)
  • Personal Injury (2,906)
  • Planning (3,239)
  • Police (1,549)
  • Prisons (1,248)
  • Professional Negligence (1,619)
  • Rating (670)
  • Registered Land (823)
  • Road Traffic (1,211)
  • Scotland (16,745)
  • Stamp Duty (187)
  • Taxes – Other (2,256)
  • Taxes Management (1,381)
  • Torts – Other (2,759)
  • Transport (2,049)
  • Trusts (1,473)
  • Undue Influence (152)
  • Utilities (477)
  • VAT (5,534)
  • Vicarious Liability (248)
  • Wales (16)
  • Wills and Probate (1,781)

Recent Posts

  • Direct Line Insurance Plc v Snoop4.Com Ltd: Nom 27 Sep 2002
  • Meyrick Estate Management Ltd and others v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: Admn 3 Nov 2005
  • Williams and Humbert Ltd v W and H Trade Marks (Jersey) Ltd: HL 1986
  • Coogan v Norfil Ltd: FENI 23 Sep 2002
  • Fletcher v Rushcliffe Borough Council: EAT 7 Apr 2005
  • McKiernon v Secretary of State for Social Security: CA 26 Oct 1989
  • Chandler v Church: 1987
  • Regina v Berry: 1963
  • Guild v Eskander Ltd: 2003
  • Earl Beauchamp v Winn: HL 1873
  • Omar’s Trustees v Omar: ChD 2000
  • Bedder v Director of Public Prosecutions: HL 1954
  • Practice Direction (Criminal proceedings: Classification and allocation of busienss): SC 26 May 2005
  • Esal Commodities v Oriental Credit Ltd: CA 1985
  • Lonhro plc v Fayed: HL 28 Jun 1991
  • Raffety v Schofield: 1897
  • Regina v Secretary of State for Social Security, Ex parte Britnell (Alan): HL 1991
  • Smoker v London Fire and Civil Defence Authority: HL 1991
  • Vehicle and Operator Services Agency, Regina (on the Application of) v Henderson: Admn 15 Dec 2004
  • Bensaude v Thames and Mersey Marine Insurance Co Ltd: HL 1897
  • Diezler and Others v Economic and Social Committee of the European Communities: ECJ 27 Oct 1987
  • Wells v North East Lincolnshire Council: EAT 5 Oct 2001
  • Yalcin v Turquie: ECHR 12 Dec 2002
  • Brown v Firth Rixson Special Steel Ltd: EAT 28 Feb 2002
  • Sogukpinar v Turquie: ECHR 12 Dec 2002
  • Erwin Conradi And Others v Direction De La Concurrence Et Des Prix Des Hauts-De-Seine Et Ministere Public: ECJ 12 Nov 1987
  • (Un-named) (AA): SSCS 15 Dec 2004
  • Atkinson v Morris: CA 1897
  • Soph. Symeonidis Anonimos Emboriki Eteria Sigaretton Kai Ikodomikon Epichirisseon Ae v Minister For Commerce: ECJ 28 Oct 1987
  • Pirelli Cables Ltd v K Guerard: EAT 16 Sep 2004
  • Burgorgue v France: ECHR 5 Dec 2000
  • Wheatley v Royal British Legion: EAT 16 Oct 2002
  • Peskett v Portsmouth City Council: CA 25 Jun 2002
  • Britton v Royal Insurance Company: 1865
  • Davis and Jordan v James: 1770
  • Princess Paley Olga v Weisz: 1929
  • Regina v Chisam: CCA 1963
  • Lesley and Company v Cumming: KBD 1926
  • Lek v Mathews: 1927
  • Regina v Secretary of State for Employment, Ex Parte Seymour-Smith and Another: QBD 1995
  • Anderson v Express Investment Company Limited City of Edinburgh Council: OHCS 11 Dec 2003
  • Mcfarlane v Scottish Borders Council: OHCS 19 Dec 2003
  • Britax Rumbold Ltd v Ogunsanya: EAT 7 Mar 2003
  • Mah v State Street Bank and Trust Company: EAT 7 Mar 2003
  • Grambas v British Broadcasting Corporation: EAT 7 Mar 2003
  • Lodwick v London Borough of Southwark: EAT 7 Mar 2003
  • Henderson CA (the Liquidator of Letham Grange Development Co Ltd) v 3052772 Nova Scotia Limited: OHCS 9 Dec 2003
  • Direct Line Insurance Plc v Khan and Another: CA 11 Oct 2001
  • Lowery v The Queen: PC 1974
  • Lloyd v McMahon: CA 1986

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.