References: [1818] EngR 233, (1818) 5 Price 522, (1818) 146 ER 682
Links: Commonlii
A plaintiff having arrested two of the partners on a quo minus, and proceeded against an absent third by ven. fac. Ad. resp. under which issues, and increased issues, had been levied on the partnership goods – the Court refused, on cause shewn against a rule for that purpose, to set aside the proceedings, and order the money levied to be restored, and the effects to be delivered up, although it was sworn, on the part of the absent defendant, that he was absent on his business of mariner, and not for the purpose of avoiding proceedings. – N. – Such a rule discharged with costs.
Last Update: 21-Sep-15 Ref: 332233