Site icon swarb.co.uk

Macmillan Inc v Bishopsgate Investment Trust Plc: CA 1 Sep 1993

A subpoena ad duces tecum issued against a third party was to be used to bring evidence before the court, not as an equivalent to discovery.
Judge’s discretion not to order production not to be interfered with.

Citations:

Times 17-May-1993, Gazette 01-Sep-1993

Statutes:

Companies Act 1985

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appeal fromMacmillan Inc v Bishopsgate Investment Trust Plc Chd 17-Mar-1993
Evidence given to a liquidator was not discoverable in civil proceedings. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice

Updated: 26 October 2022; Ref: scu.83281

Exit mobile version