MA and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: CA 21 Feb 2014

The claimants were in recipet of housing benefit. They claimed that the new benefits cap (‘bedroom tax’) discriminated against them when additional space was need for the care of family members with disabilities
Lord Dyson MR, Longmore and Ryder LJJ
[2014] EWCA Civ 13, [2014] WLR(D) 87, [2014] PTSR 584
Bailii, WLRD
England and Wales
Citing:
Appeal fromMA and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and Others QBD 30-Jul-2013
Ten disabled claimants challenged the changes to the 2006 Regulations introduced by the 2012 Regulations. The changes restricted the ability to claim Housing Benefit for bedrooms deemed extra. The claimants said that in their different ways each had . .

Cited by:
Appeal fromMA and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions SC 9-Nov-2016
The appellants claimed housing benefit. They appealed against rejection of their claims that the imposition of limits to the maximum sums payable, ‘the bedroom tax’, was unlawful on equality grounds. The claimants either had disabilities, or lived . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 07 April 2021; Ref: scu.521626