M T Hojgaard A/S v EOn Climate and Renewables UK, Robin Rigg East Ltd and Another: CA 22 May 2014

The claimant contracted with the defendants for the supply of a barge for delivery of equipment to offshore wind farms. The barge proved inadequate. The company supplied an alternative vessel, and the parties now disputed the financial consequences.

Judges:

Longmore, Patten, Christopher Clarke LJJ

Citations:

[2014] EWCA Civ 710

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appeal fromMT Hojgaard A/S v E.On Climate and Renewables and Others TCC 15-Apr-2014
The claimant had constructed a substantial windfarm according to an international standard later shown to be defective. The defendant argued that the contract also required that the work be to a standard guaranteed a service life of 20 years.

Cited by:

At CAMT Hojgaard As v EON Climate and Renewables UK Robin Rigg East Ltd and Another SC 3-Aug-2017
The defendants had requested tenders for the design and construction of an offshore wind farm. The court now considered the situation arising because of inconsistencies between documents in the tender request. The successful tender was based upon an . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Contract

Updated: 04 September 2022; Ref: scu.525634