Site icon swarb.co.uk

M and Others, Regina (on the Application Of) v Revenue and Customs and others: CA 6 Mar 2007

The applicants complained that though none of them was suspected of terrorist activity, their finances had been restricted because of their family connections with Osama Bin Laden.

Judges:

Maurice Kay LJ, Wilson LJ, Sir Peter Gibson

Citations:

[2007] EWCA Civ 173

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appeal fromM and others v HM Treasury Admn 22-Sep-2006
The claimants sought payment of benefits. They would otherwise have been entitled, and were not suspected themselves, but were family members of persons listed as suspected terrorists under the Resolution, and had been denied benefits acordingly. . .

Cited by:

Appeal fromM, Regina (on the Application of) v Her Majestys Treasury HL 30-Apr-2008
The House referred to the ECJ a question about the implementation of UN resolutions imposing sanctions on Al-Qa’ida. . .
At Court of AppealM (FC) and Others v Her Majesty’s Treasury (Common Foreign And Security Policy) ECJ 14-Jan-2010
Europa Restrictive measures directed against persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban Prohibition of making funds available for the benefit of persons and . .
At Court of AppealM (FC) and Others (Common Foreign And Security Policy) ECJ 29-Apr-2010
Control of Funds of Terrorist Associates
ECJ Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban – Freezing of funds and economic resources – . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Crime, Benefits

Updated: 15 October 2022; Ref: scu.250584

Exit mobile version