The Crown had conceded that the appellant had had no prior involvement in drug-trafficking before the conspiracy in question which led to the confiscation proceedings.
Held: Such a concession should not be ignored unless and until it was withdrawn.
Eady J
[2004] EWCA Crim 1125, [2005] 1 Cr App Reports (S) 111, [2005] 1 Cr App Rep (S) 24, [2004] Crim LR 678, [2005] 1 Cr App R(S) 111
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Knaggs v Regina CACD 13-Jul-2009
The defendant appealed against a confiscation order, made on the basis of evidence secured from a probe installed in his car. He had made clear that he disputed the recordings. A second judge had inherited the proceedings, and ruled that he could . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 27 October 2021; Ref: scu.346281 br>