Site icon swarb.co.uk

LT Piver Sarl v S and J Perfume Co Ltd: 1987

A plaintiff’s representative saw an article on premises which he was inspecting pursuant to an Anton Piller order which he thought infringed the rights of third parties.
Held: He was at liberty to report this to the third party concerned.

Citations:

[1987] FSR 159

Cited by:

CitedDirector of the Assets Recovery Agency v Szepietowski and others Admn 29-Sep-2006
The respondent had objected that the appointment of an interim receiver had been based upon information obtained in the course of investigations undertaken in connection with different proceedings and allegations.
Held: The enforcement agency . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice

Updated: 10 May 2022; Ref: scu.247611

Exit mobile version