A plaintiff’s representative saw an article on premises which he was inspecting pursuant to an Anton Piller order which he thought infringed the rights of third parties.
Held: He was at liberty to report this to the third party concerned.
Citations:
[1987] FSR 159
Cited by:
Cited – Director of the Assets Recovery Agency v Szepietowski and others Admn 29-Sep-2006
The respondent had objected that the appointment of an interim receiver had been based upon information obtained in the course of investigations undertaken in connection with different proceedings and allegations.
Held: The enforcement agency . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Litigation Practice
Updated: 10 May 2022; Ref: scu.247611