Site icon swarb.co.uk

Lovelidge v Anselm Odling and Sons Ltd: 1967

The court was asked whether a flexible revolving drive shaft was ‘machinery’.
Held: A drive shaft connecting an electric motor to a cutting wheel could itself constitute machinery.

Citations:

[1967] 2 QB 351

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedReilly v National Insurance and Guarantee Corporation Ltd CA 19-Dec-2008
The claimant sold fire extinguishers. Three failed, resulting in damage to the purchaser’s properties. His insurers refused to pay an indemnity saying that the failure was the failure of a piece of machinery (the switchgear) and was not covered by . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Contract

Updated: 02 May 2022; Ref: scu.279051

Exit mobile version