Longstaff International Ltd v Baker Mckenzie: ChD 16 Jun 2004

A request for security for costs based upon impecuniosity calls for an assessment of what the claimant may be expected to have available for payment at the due date or dates in the form of cash or other readily realisable assets.

The Honourable Mr Justice Park
[2004] EWHC 1852 (Ch), [2004] 1 WLR 2917, [2005] CLY 465
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedTulip Trading Ltd v Bitcoin Association for BSV and Others ChD 5-Jan-2022
Security required for Bitcoin claim
Two applications for security for costs. The claimant claimed against fifteen overseas residents requiring a re-write of cryotocurrency systems so that he could recover sums he said were due to him in respect of Bitcoin assets which he said have . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Costs

Updated: 26 January 2022; Ref: scu.671260