Site icon swarb.co.uk

London Borough of Islington v Bannon and Another: EAT 25 Sep 2012

EAT Transfer of Undertakings : Transfer
Islington was not able to effect its intended service provision change from CSV to Action for Children due concerns by the latter over the Claimant’ disciplinary record with CSV. At the last minute it took in-house the discharge of its statutory duties under the Children Act. The Employment Judge correctly found there was a service provision change. The appeal by Islington was dismissed and a hearing of the Claimant’s unfair dismissal case ordered.

Judges:

McMullen QC J

Citations:

[2012] UKEAT 0221 – 12 – 2509

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Employment

Updated: 09 November 2022; Ref: scu.466335

Exit mobile version