Links: Home | swarblaw - law discussions

swarb.co.uk - law index


These cases are from the lawindexpro database. They are now being transferred to the swarb.co.uk website in a better form. As a case is published there, an entry here will link to it. The swarb.co.uk site includes many later cases.  














Health Professions - From: 2003 To: 2003

This page lists 99 cases, and was prepared on 27 May 2018.

 
JD v East Berkshire Community Health [2003] Lloyd's Rep Med 9
2003
QBD
Judge Hale
Professional Negligence, Health Professions
The claimants sought damages after being wrongfully accused of abusing their children. Held: Public policy considerations militated strongly against the existence of any duty on the facts of the case. No duty of care can be owed by the doctor or the social worker to the parent, and accordingly no claim may lie and these claims must be dismissed with no evidence called and no detailed examination of the facts.
1 Citers


 
Robinson (New Beginners Nursery Ltd) v [2002] EWCST 88(PC)
3 Jan 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
B v Secretary of State for Health [2002] EWCST 51(PC)
3 Jan 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Kevin Francis Gangar v The General Medical Council
8 Jan 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC
[ PC ] - [ PC ]
 
Aaalamani, Regina (on the Application Of) v General Medical Council [2003] EWHC 347 (Admin)
14 Jan 2003
Admn

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Kirk v The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons [2003] UKPC 3
14 Jan 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Disciplinary Committee of the RCVS
[ PC ] - [ Bailii ]
 
Dr Usha S N Singh v The General Medical Council
21 Jan 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC
[ PC ]
 
Dr Naveed Hasan v The General Medical Council [2003] UKPC 5
21 Jan 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC
[ Bailii ] - [ PC ]
 
Dr Surendra Charan Misra v The General Medical Council [2003] UKPC 7
22 Jan 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC
[ Bailii ] - [ PC ]
 
Aaalamani v The General Medical Council [2003] UKPC 8
22 Jan 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Committee on Professional Performance of The General Medical Council
[ PC ] - [ Bailii ]
 
Das, Regina (on the Application Of) v General Medical Council [2003] EWHC 132 (Admin)
24 Jan 2003
Admn

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Dr Peter Henry Gauvain Sandon v The General Medical Council [2003] UKPC 18
27 Jan 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC
[ PC ] - [ Bailii ]
 
Dr Rajnikant Kantilal Patel v The General Medical Council
27 Jan 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC
[ PC ]
 
Verney-Jackson v OFSTED [2002] EWCST 89(EY)
29 Jan 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Priory Hospitals Ltd v National Care Standards Commission [2002] EWCST 46(NC)
6 Feb 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Singh v General Medical Council (Gmc) [2003] UKPC 15
17 Feb 2003
PC

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Patel v General Medical Council (Gmc) [2003] UKPC 16
17 Feb 2003
PC

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
W, Regina (on the Application Of) v National Care Standards Commission [2003] EWHC 621 (Admin)
17 Feb 2003
Admn

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Hayward and Another v National Assembly of Wales [2002] EWCST 94(EY)
21 Feb 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Appiah-Anane v National Care Standards Commission [2002] EWCST 0096(NC)
5 Mar 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]

 
 Regina v Secretary of State for Health ex parte Quintavalle (on behalf of Pro-Life Alliance); HL 13-Mar-2003 - [2003] UKHL 13; Times, 14 March 2003; [2003] 2 WLR 692; [2003] 2 AC 687; (2003) 71 BMLR 209; [2003] 1 FCR 577; [2003] 2 All ER 113
 
Akhter and Another (Woodbine Villa) v Ncsc [2002] EWCST 116(NC)
13 Mar 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Dr Adil Mahmud Raji v The General Medical Council [2003] UKPC 24; Times, 31 March 2003; Gazette, 29 May 2003
19 Mar 2003
PC
Steyn, Rodger of Earlsferry LL, Sir Andrew Leggatt
Health Professions
PC (The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC) The appellant had applied to the Committee to be restored to the medical register. He was not represented. The committee had required him at the same time, to present his application, and also to make representations as to why he should not be prevented from making further applications. Held: The procedure was flawed. The procedure was not justified by the rules, and was not necessary. The effect, particularly for an applicant in person, would be to require him, in effect to argue contradictory cases, and would thus inhibit his main application. The committee should hear the main application, and only if it rejected that application should it ask if there were reasons why he should not be barred from re-applying.
Medical Act 1983 41
[ PC ] - [ Bailii ] - [ PC ]

 
 Tait v The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons; PC 20-Mar-2003 - [2003] UKPC 34
 
Speed v Secretary of State for Education and Skills [2002] EWCST 0078(PC)
26 Mar 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Moseley v Secretary of State for Education and Skills [2002] EWCST 1(PC)
4 Apr 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Gough (Chorley Nursing Home) v National Care Standards Commission [2003] EWCST 125(NC)
4 Apr 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Gangar v General Medical Council (Gmc) [2003] UKPC 28
8 Apr 2003
PC

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Hollingworth and others v Specialist Training Authority of the Medical Royal Colleges [2003] EWCA Civ 452
8 Apr 2003
CA

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Dr Pratap Gosai v The General Medical Council [2003] UKPC 31; Times, 30 April 2003
10 Apr 2003
PC
Hoffmann, Walker of Gestingthorpe LL, Sir Phillip Otton
Health Professions
PC (The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC) The doctor challenged the decision of the committee to invoke its power to restrain him from making further applications to be restored to the register. Held: The power to restrain a doctor from making repeated requests fr restoration was draconian, but that did not mean that it should only be exercised in the most serious or clear of cases. The discretion given to the committee was unfettered.
1 Cites

[ Bailii ] - [ PC ]
 
Mohammed Al-Fallouji v The General Medical Council [2003] UKPC 30
10 Apr 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC
[ Bailii ] - [ PC ]
 
Dr Silver v The General Medical Council [2003] UKPC 33
14 Apr 2003
PC
Lord Hutton, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Sir Philip Otton
Health Professions
(General Medical Council) The appellant appealed a finding of serious professional misconduct and his suspension from the medical register for twelve months. Over a nine day period despite prompts from the son, a daughter and two other health care professionals, the appellant failed to ensure that the patient received suitable or prompt medical attention. The patient was eventually admitted to hospital by the emergency services and found to be suffering from a fractured neck of the left femur. He claimed that a witness had been shown to have not told the truth and this his whole evidence should have been rejected. Held: The committee had heard the witness and taken only part of his evidence as tru. They were not under a duty to reject it all. There was one finding in an entire career, and the board were not satisfied that the committee had followed the correct reasoning. The finding of serious professional misconduct could not be supported.
1 Cites

1 Citers

[ Bailii ] - [ PC ] - [ PC ]
 
C v Ofsted [2002] EWCST 0087(EY)
22 Apr 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Ram and Another, Re an Appeal By [2002] EWCST 100(EY)
25 Apr 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
George, Regina (on the Application Of) v GMC South Staffordshire Healthcare NHS Trust [2003] EWHC 1124 (Admin)
1 May 2003
Admn

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Dr Athanassios Lambiris v The Specialist Training Authority of the Medical Royal Colleges and the General Medical Council, the Secretary of State for Health - Interested Parties [2003] EWCA Civ 609
8 May 2003
CA
Lord Justice Aldous Lord Justice Buxton Lord Justice Rix
Health Professions, European, Administrative
The applicant challenged the failure to register him properly to reflect his specialism for which he had been qualified in Greece. Held: The Directive set out principles for the recognition of medical qualifications within the Union. The Order applied the Directive. The article 43 right of establishment is mediated through a combination of the very broad principle in Article 43 EC and any in specific community legislation. Rights of establishment are not to be used to put a person relying on rights derived from movement between member states in a better position than the citizens of the host state to which he moves. The purpose of Article 8 is to enable the incoming applicant to acquire, and thereafter to practise under, the qualification awarded by the host state. Since the Authority exercised a specialist knowledge its decision would have to be clearly irrational before a court could intervene. That had not been shown here.
European Specialist Medical Qualifications Order 1995 - Directive 93/16/EEC - Article 43 EC
1 Cites

[ Bailii ]
 
A B and others v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust [2003] EWHC 1034 (QB); Gazette, 22 April 2004
9 May 2003
QBD
Gage J
Litigation Practice, Health Professions, Costs
The claimants were involved in a group litigation with regard to the removal of organs without consent from deceased children. The defendant sought an order capping the costs which might be claimed. Held: In GLO cases the desirability of ensuring that costs are kept within bounds makes it unnecessary for the court to require exceptional circumstances before exercising its discretion to make a costs cap order. Any costs cap should only relate to the costs incurred in relation to generic issues. An order was made identifying limits to the separate areas. The court's general powers of case management were sufficiently wide to encompass the making of a costs capping order both in group litigation and in other actions.
Supreme Court Act 1981 51
1 Cites

1 Citers

[ Bailii ]
 
Fun Camps Ltd and others v Ofsted [2003] EWCST 124(EY)
12 May 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
British Medical Association v Chaudhary [2003] EWCA Civ 645; Times, 20 May 2003; [2003] ICR 1512
15 May 2003
CA
Lord Justice Mummery Lord Justice Pill Lord Justice Latham
Health Professions, Discrimination
The claimant had sought registration as a specialist medical practitioner by the respondent. His complaint that the crtiria used to reject his claim were discriminatory had been rejected by the employment tribunal and EAT on the basis that they had no jurisdiction. Held: The section and rules establishing the Training authority clearly reserved to that authority exclusive jurisdiction, and the tribunal had been right to decline to hear it.
Race Relations Act 1976 54(2)
1 Cites

1 Citers

[ Bailii ]
 
Needham v Nursing and Midwifery Council [2003] EWHC 1141 (Admin)
21 May 2003
Admn

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
In re B (Childen: Patient Confidentiality) Times, 01 July 2003
21 May 2003
CA
Thorpe, LJ, Bodey J
Children, Health Professions
A pyschiatrist treating a child was given information under the cloak of professional privilege, to suggest there had been abuse. She had reported her concerns to the child protection services, and gone on to make a statement. Held: A health professional in such circumstances may well be correct to break confidentialty but must recognise that if she goes beyond reporting her concerns to making a statement, she cannot then object to being called as witness if that evidence is used.

 
Skidmore v Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust [2003] UKHL 27; Times, 23 May 2003; Gazette, 10 July 2003; [2003] Lloyds Rep Med 369; (2003) 73 BMLR 209; [2003] ICR 721; [2003] IRLR 445; [2003] 3 All ER 292
22 May 2003
HL
Lord Bingham of Cornhill, Lord Steyn, Lord Clyde, Lord Hutton, Lord Scott of Foscote
Health Professions
The disciplinary code for doctors employed by the NHS provides different procedures cases involving allegations of "professional conduct" or "personal conduct." The first would involve a more judicial process, and the second a more informal disciplinary process. The allegations were of having misled others both patients and authorities, and had been treated as personal conduct. The CA had decided that it was properly classified as professional misconduct. Held: No public law considerations applied. The Trust made the decision, but must do so within the contract. Here, the decision was clearly flawed since the acts complained of were part of the claimant's professional conduct. Acts committed as part of a professional practice were to distinguished from acts for which the professional practice provided opportunity.
Lord Steyn said: "It is common ground . . that the questions before the House must be resolved within the framework of the contract between Mr Skidmore and the trust. That is so despite the fact that a public body is involved. Prima facie therefore the position is as follows. The trust is entitled to decide what disciplinary route should be followed. That decision must, however, comply with the terms of the contract. If a non-conforming decision is taken and acted upon, there is a breach of contract resulting in the usual remedies. The only escape from this position would be if it could be shown that the parties agreed upon wording in their contract making it clear that the employer's decision would be final thereby excluding the role of the court except, of course, in cases of bad faith or possibly the absence of reasonable grounds for the decision. There is no such provision in the present contract. It does, of course, provide that "It is for the authority to decide under which category a case falls". This provision merely states the obvious: the trust must take the initial decision to commence the appropriate disciplinary procedure. It is, however, quite insufficient to exclude the normal consequences of a failure to follow the agreed contractual procedures. If there has been a breach by the trust in adopting the wrong procedure, Mr Skidmore is entitled to appropriate relief."
Department of Health Circular HC (90)9
1 Cites

1 Citers

[ House of Lords ] - [ Bailii ]
 
W v Secretary of State for Health [2002] EWCST 115(PC)
24 May 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Brown and Another (High Ridge Children'S Home) v National Care Standards Commission [2002] EWCST 83(NC)
25 May 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Dr Carruthers v The General Medical Council [2003] UKPC 42
3 Jun 2003
PC
Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, The Rt. Hon. Justice Tipping
Health Professions
PC (The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC) The doctor appealed a finding of serious professional misconduct. He sought to practice in a controversial field, the 'andropause'. He accepted patients through his web-site, and gave advice. A patient was also being treated by another GP, who disagreed with the diagnosis. Complaint was made that he had disgnosed the patient without seeing him or taking a proper history. He now complained that the PCC had reached technical conclusions in a highly specialised field and without the expertise needed. Held: The Committee had done no more than found that the doctor had overstepped the mark in his advice, and thereby undermined the patient's own doctor's fragile relationship with him. As to the conditions on his practice restricting his ability to advise by email, the conditions had been arrived at after an in camera discussion without either party having opportunity to comment. The condition requiring him to attend training had been shown to be unworkable, and the restriction on his giving advice by email did not flow from any direct criticism of his practice. Certain conditions were removed.
Medical Act 1983 36(1)(b)(iii) - General Medical Council Preliminary Proceedings Committee and Professional Conduct Committee (Procedure) Rules Order of Council 1988 (SI 1988/2255) 37(2)
[ Bailii ] - [ PC ]
 
Coventry Homes (Mhc) Ltd v National Care Standards Commission [2002] EWCST 17(NC)
13 Jun 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Alternative Futures Ltd v National Care Standards Commission [2002] EWCST 111(NC)
16 Jun 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Dr MateuLopez v The General Medical Council
16 Jun 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC
[ PC ]
 
Dr MateuLopez v The General Medical Council [2003] UKPC 44
16 Jun 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC
[ Bailii ] - [ PC ]
 
Khan, Regina (on the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Health [2003] EWHC 1414 (Admin)
17 Jun 2003
Admn

Health Professions, Coroners

1 Cites

1 Citers

[ Bailii ]
 
Kirk v The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons
17 Jun 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Disciplinary Committee of the RCVS
[ PC ] - [ PC ]
 
LM v Ofsted [2003] EWCST 181(EY)
27 Jun 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Toth, Regina (on the Application of) v General Medical Council [2003] EWHC 1675 (Admin)
27 Jun 2003
Admn

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Mahfouz, Regina (on the Application of) v General Medical Council [2003] EWHC 1695 (Admin)
27 Jun 2003
Admn

Health Professions

1 Cites

1 Citers

[ Bailii ]

 
 Dr Bose v The General Medical Council; PC 30-Jun-2003 - [2003] UKPC 52
 
Stringer v OFSTED [2003] EWCST 166(EY)
11 Jul 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Luck v Secretary of State [2003] EWCST 148(PC)
11 Jul 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Dr Qureshi v The General Medical Council [2003] UKHL 56; Times, 03 September 2003
14 Jul 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC (The Committee on Professional Performance of the GMC) A complaint had been made against the doctor with regard to certain areas of his practice. The committee had ordered him to undergo assessments also of other areas of his practice. Held: Krippendorf should not be read to restrict the Committee to ordering assessments only in respect of those areas of a doctor's practice about which complaint had been made. Some skills are central to almost any doctor's practice, and evidence of deficiencies in one area might well suggest the need for assessmnet in others. The statute was not limited in the way suggested, and the appeal was denied.
Medical Act 1983 36A
1 Cites

[ Bailii ] - [ PC ]
 
Dr Brocklebank v The General Medical Council [2003] UKHL 57
14 Jul 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Health Committee of the GMC
[ Bailii ] - [ PC ] - [ PC ]
 
Sadler v The General Medical Council [2003] UKHL 59; Times, 29 September 2003; [2004] Lloyd's Rep Med 44; [2004] HRLR 8; [2003] 1 WLR 2259
15 Jul 2003
PC
Lord Rodger of Earsferry, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Sir Phillip Otton
Health Professions, Human Rights, Natural Justice
(The Committee on Professional Performance of the GMC) The distinction drawn in Krippendorf between a practitioner's current competence and past performance was not to be taken too far. The purpose of the assessment was not to punish the practitioner, but to protect the public. The standard of proof was accordingly the civil standard of balance of probabilities. The Board considered the role of members of the GMC sitting as panel members of its Committee on Professional Performance. It was argued that the presence of GMC members on the CPP panels was contrary to the domestic doctrine of apparent bias or to ECHR article 6. Held: Lord Hope pointed out that there is no general principle of Convention jurisprudence which prevents such self-regulation and that everything depended on all the relevant circumstances. As to the relevant rules and the protection afforded by them, their Lordships were satisfied that the CPP met the Convention requirements.
European Convention on Human Rights
1 Cites

1 Citers

[ Bailii ] - [ PC ] - [ PC ]
 
Mr Pembrey v The General Medical Council [2003] UKHL 60
15 Jul 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC
[ Bailii ] - [ PC ] - [ PC ]
 
K v Ofsted [2003] EWCST 191(EYSUS)
22 Jul 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Martin Knight v Rochdale Healthcare NHS Trust, the National Health Service Litigation Authority, the Secretary of State for Health [2003] EWHC 1831 (QB); [2004] 1 WLR 371
23 Jul 2003
QBD
Mr Justice Crane
Health Professions, Professional Negligence, Limitation
A contribution to a damages award was sought. The two year period under section 10 had expired between the anniversary of the date on which an agreement to settle the victim's claim had been made and the anniversary of the consent order which had given effect to the agreement. The court had to decide whether the period for limitation purposes was fixed by subsection 10(3) or 10(4). Held: A consent order amounted to a "judgment". Subsection 10(4) applied and the contribution claim was time barred: "My principal reason for doing so is if a firm agreement is made, as here, time undoubtedly starts to run at that moment. It would be different if the agreement required the making of a consent order before it took effect. Neither party so contends here. Although Parliament could have decided that a consent order should restart the clock, there are insufficiently clear words to indicate that. Indeed the words in subsection (1) "Where…any person becomes entitled" and the words in subsection (4) "the earliest date on which the amount…is agreed" suggest that the crucial moment is the first moment when liability arises. It is tidy to conclude that subsections (3) and (4) deal separately with cases decided by a court (or arbitrator) and cases of agreement."
Limitation Act 1980 10(3) 10(4)
1 Citers

[ Bailii ]
 
Dr Chaman Lal Anand v The General Medical Council
24 Jul 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC
1 Citers

[ PC ]
 
Dr Seyedi v The General Medical Council
24 Jul 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC
[ PC ]
 
Shaw v OFSTED [2003] EWCST 0171(EY)
14 Aug 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Walker, Regina (on the Application of) v General Medical Council [2003] EWHC 2308 (Admin)
15 Aug 2003
Admn
Stanley Burnton J
Health Professions
Where a doctor sought to have lifted an extension to his suspension, the court should start from the position that the suspension was currently in place before deciding whether it needed altering. However, "The terms of subsection 10 indicate that the appeal to the Court is a full appeal, that is to say, the Court does not interfere on a review ground but itself decides what order is appropriate."
Medical Acts 1983 1(a) 41A(10)
1 Citers

[ Bailii ]

 
 Landeshauptstadt Kiel v Norbert Jaeger; ECJ 9-Sep-2003 - C-151/02; Times, 26 September 2003; [2003] EUECJ C-151/02; [2004] ICR 1528; (2004) 75 BMLR 201; [2003] 3 CMLR 16; [2003] ECR I-8389; [2004] All ER (EC) 604; [2003] IRLR 804
 
Cdb v Ofsted [2003] EWCST 0132(EY)
12 Sep 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Spicer v Ofsted (Quashed) [2003] EWCST 0165(JP)
24 Sep 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Bradbury v National Care Standards Commission [2003] EWCST 0178(NC)
1 Oct 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Seyedi v General Medical Council (GMC) [2003] UKPC 67
3 Oct 2003
PC

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Anand v General Medical Council [2003] UKPC 66
3 Oct 2003
PC

Health Professions

1 Cites

[ Bailii ]
 
Biswas v General Medical Council [2003] EWHC 2342 (Admin)
16 Oct 2003
Admn
The Honourable Mr Justice Wall
Health Professions
The doctor appealed findings of unprofessional misconduct in respect of three patients. Held: The court could identify no error of law in the findings, and the committee had evidence before them to support the findings they had made.
Medical Act 1983 40(1)
[ Bailii ]
 
Reece v Secretary of State for Health [2003] EWCST 129(PC)
18 Oct 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Dr Otote v The General Medical Council [2003] UKPC 71
21 Oct 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC
[ PC ] - [ Bailii ]
 
Hamilton, Regina (on the Application of) v UK Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting and Another [2003] EWCA Civ 1600; Times, 12 November 2003
23 Oct 2003
CA
Schieman, Sedley, Jacob LJJ
Health Professions, Human Rights
The nurse suffered bipolar disorder, and was suspended. She wanted to have her suspension reviewed. The rules made no express provision for such an application. Held: The absence of an express power did not mean that such a power did not exist. It did. The refusal in this case was not because the health committee of the respondent saw itself as not having a power to do so, but rather on the facts. Though the registration as a nurse or midwife might be a property right protected by the Convention, that right had not been infringed.
European Convention on Human Rights - Nurses, Midwifery and Health Visitors (Professional Conduct) Rules (1993 no 893)
[ Bailii ]
 
Lannas, Regina (on the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] EWHC 3142 (Admin)
24 Oct 2003
Admn

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Walkes v Ofsted [2003] EWCST 212(EYSUS)
27 Oct 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Akhter and Another (Woodbine Villa) v NCSC (Costs Application) [2002] EWCST 116(NC)
27 Oct 2003
CST

Health Professions, Costs

[ Bailii ]
 
Aaalamani, Regina (on the Application Of) v General Medical Council [2003] EWHC 2582 (Admin)
27 Oct 2003
Admn

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Jh v Ofsted [2003] EWCST 0228(EYSUS)
28 Oct 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Dr Malkhandi v The General Medical Council [2003] UKPC 73
29 Oct 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC
[ Bailii ] - [ PC ] - [ PC ]
 
Susan Collier v The Council for Professions Supplementary to Medicine (The Paramedics Board) [2003] UKPC 72
29 Oct 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Disciplinary Committee of the HPC
PC The Disciplinary Committee of the HPC
[ Bailii ] - [ PC ] - [ PC ]
 
Dr Donnelly v The General Medical Council [2003] UKPC 74
3 Nov 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC
[ PC ] - [ Bailii ]
 
Dr Donnelly v The General Medical Council
3 Nov 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC
[ PC ]
 
Dr Dhirendra Nath Das v The General Medical Council [2003] UKHL 75
6 Nov 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Committee on Professional Performance of the GMC
[ PC ] - [ Bailii ]
 
D v Secretary of State for Health [2002] EWCST 118(PC)
6 Nov 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
AbuRomia v General Medical Council [2003] EWHC 2515 (Admin)
7 Nov 2003
Admn
Wall J
Health Professions
When hearing an appeal against a penalty imposed by the conduct committee the court could "only intervene if the penalty … is disproportionate to the misconduct" and "If the Committee has taken all relevant factors into account and reached a conclusion which is within a reasonable range of penalties, I cannot interfere."
1 Citers

[ Bailii ]
 
Ag v Ofsted [2003] EWCST 232(EYSUS)
11 Nov 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Dr Salha and Mr Abusheikha v The General Medical Council
24 Nov 2003
PC

Health Professions
PC The Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC
[ PC ]
 
Salha and Another v General Medical Council (Gmc) [2003] UKHL 80
24 Nov 2003
PC

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Sr v Ofsted [2003] EWCST 240(EYSUS)
28 Nov 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
B v Secretary of State for Education and Skills [2003] EWCST 0200(PC)
3 Dec 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Krishnamurthy, Regina (on the Application Of) v General Medical Council [2003] EWHC 3200 (Admin)
9 Dec 2003
Admn

Health Professions

Medical Act 1983 40(1)(aa)
[ Bailii ]
 
Lynch v General Dental Council [2003] EWHC 2987 (Admin)
10 Dec 2003
Admn

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
The Senate of Surgery and others v Chaudhary and others UKEAT/919/03; [2003] UKEAT 0919_03_1712
17 Dec 2003
EAT
His Hon Judge Clark
Employment, Health Professions, Discrimination
EAT Practice and Procedure - Amendment
[ Bailii ] - [ EATn ]
 
Wh v Ncsc [2003] EWCST 176(NC)
18 Dec 2003
CST

Health Professions

[ Bailii ]
 
Agarwal v General Medical Council [2003] UKPC 87
18 Dec 2003
PC

Health Professions
(General Medical Council) Appeal from a decision of the Professional Conduct Committee of the respondent giving a direction that his name should be erased from the Medical Register, following a finding by the Committee that the appellant was guilty of serious professional misconduct.
[ Bailii ]
 
Copyright 2014 David Swarbrick, 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse, West Yorkshire HD6 2AG.