Links: Home | swarblaw - law discussions

swarb.co.uk - law index


These cases are from the lawindexpro database. They are now being transferred to the swarb.co.uk website in a better form. As a case is published there, an entry here will link to it. The swarb.co.uk site includes many later cases.  















Customs and Excise - From: 1992 To: 1992

This page lists 3 cases, and was prepared on 02 April 2018.


 
 Wunsche v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas; ECJ 4-Jun-1992 - C-21/91; [1992] EUECJ C-21/91; [1992] ECR I-3647
 
Pham Hoang v France 13191/87; (1992) 16 EHRR 53; [1992] ECHR 61
25 Sep 1992
ECHR

Human Rights, Customs and Excise
Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion); No violation of Art. 6-1; No violation of Art. 6-2; Violation of Art. 6-3-c; Pecuniary damage - claim rejected; Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
1 Citers

[ Bailii ] - [ Bailii ]
 
Krohn v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas [1992] ECR I-6661; [1992] EUECJ C-194/91
16 Dec 1992
ECJ

European, Customs and Excise
ECJ The last sentence of Article 1 of Regulation No 482/74 on the classification of goods under subheading No 23.04 B of the Common Customs Tariff must be interpreted as meaning that the products resulting from the extraction of maize oil fall under that subheading even when they contain, in addition to the residues resulting from the extraction of oil from the actual maize germs, other substances deriving in particular from the whole of the maize plant, other cereals or soya, in so far as those substances extraneous to maize grain are present in very small quantities and it is established that it is technically impossible to avoid their presence under normal conditions of production, processing, transport, transshipment and storage, save by incurring cost disproportionate to the commercial value of the derived products in question. Since the Community legislature has not set a maximum permitted level for matter extraneous to maize grains, it is for the national court, in resolving the case before it, to fix the permissible level of such matter.
[ Bailii ]
 
Copyright 2014 David Swarbrick, 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse, West Yorkshire HD6 2AG.