swarb.co.uk - law index
These cases are from the lawindexpro database. They are now being transferred to the swarb.co.uk website in a better form. As a case is published there, an entry here will link to it. The swarb.co.uk site includes many later cases.
Commercial - From: 1994 To: 1994
This page lists 5 cases, and was prepared on 20 May 2019.
The Sormovskiy 3068 [1994] 2 Lloyds Rep 266
1994
QBD
Clarke J
Contract, Transport, Commercial
It makes commercial sense to have a simple rule that in the absence of an express term of the contract the master must only deliver the cargo to the holder of the bill of lading who presents it to him. In that way both the shipowners and the persons in truth entitled to possession of the cargo are protected by the terms of the contract.
1 Citers
Regina v Monopolies and Mergers Commission ex parte National House Building Council Times, 25 January 1994; Independent, 20 January 1994
20 Jan 1994
CA
Consumer, Commercial
There must be established a causal link between an alleged monopolistic practice and the resulting action, before the one can be attributed to the other under the Act.
Fair Trading Act 1973 48 (d)
Groupement des cartes bancaires 'CB' and Europay International v Commission T-39/92; [1994] EUECJ T-39/92
23 Feb 1994
ECFI
Commercial
ECJ Competition - Statement of objections - Price-fixing agreement - Restriction of competition - Market to be taken into consideration - Exemption - Fines.
[ Bailii ]
Her Majesty's Customs and Excise v Gerhart Schindler and Jorg Schindler Times, 30 March 1994; C-275/92; [1994] EUECJ C-275/92
24 Mar 1994
ECJ
European, Commercial
Europa The importation of lottery advertisements and tickets into a Member State with a view to the participation by residents of that State in a lottery conducted in another Member State relates to a "service" within the meaning of Article 60 of the Treaty and accordingly falls within the scope of Article 59 of the Treaty. Lottery activities, as services normally provided for remuneration constituted by the price of the ticket, do not, even as regards the cross-border sending and distribution of material objects necessary for their organization or operation, fall within the scope of the rules on the free movement of goods. Nor do they fall within the scope of the rules on the free movement of persons, or of those on free movement of capital, which concern capital movements as such and not all monetary transfers necessary to economic activities. Moreover, their classification as services is not affected by the fact that they are subject to particularly strict regulation and close control by the public authorities in the various Member States of the Community, since they cannot be regarded as activities whose harmful nature causes them to be prohibited in all the Member States and whose position under Community law may be likened to that of activities involving illegal products. Finally, neither the chance character of the winnings, as consideration for the payment received by the operator, nor the fact that, although lotteries are operated with a view to profit, participation in them may be recreational, nor even the fact that profits arising from a lottery may generally only be allocated in the public interest, prevents lottery activities from having an economic nature. National legislation which prohibits, subject to specified exceptions, the holding of lotteries in a Member State and which thus wholly precludes lottery operators from other Member States from promoting their lotteries and selling their tickets, whether directly or through independent agents, in the Member State which enacted that legislation, restricts, even though it is applicable without distinction, the freedom to provide services. However, since the legislation in question involves no discrimination on grounds of nationality, that restriction may be justified if it is for the protection of consumers and the maintenance of order in society. The particular features of lotteries justify national authorities having a sufficient degree of latitude to determine what is required to protect the players and, more generally, in the light of the specific social and cultural features of each Member State, to maintain order in society, as regards the manner in which lotteries are operated, the size of the stakes, and the allocation of the profits they yield, and to decide either to restrict or to prohibit them.
1 Citers
[ Bailii ]
Peugeot v Commission C-322/93; [1994] EUECJ C-322/93P
16 Jun 1994
ECJ
Commercial
ECJ Judgment - 1. Community law - Principles - Legal certainty - Application by the Commission of competition rules - Compliance in adopting an individual decision with the interpretation of a regulation on block exemption set out in a Commission communication
2. Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Prohibition - Block exemption - Regulation No 123/85 - Article 3(11) - Involvement of an intermediary between the distributor and the final consumer - Authorized intermediary - Concept
(Commission Regulation No 123/85, Art. 3(11))
[ Bailii ]
