swarb.co.uk - law index
These cases are from the lawindexpro database. They are now being transferred to the swarb.co.uk website in a better form. As a case is published there, an entry here will link to it. The swarb.co.uk site includes many later cases.
Benefits - From: 1995 To: 1995
This page lists 118 cases, and was prepared on 03 April 2018.
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C11-94(IS)
4 Jan 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_257_1994
4 Jan 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_179_1994
5 Jan 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC A63/95(DLA)
10 Jan 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Regina v Social Security Appeal Tribunal Chairman Ex Parte O'Hara Gazette, 11 January 1995
11 Jan 1995
QBD
Benefits
Refusal by Social Security Appeal Tribunal chairman to allow a third review of an application was not judicially reviewable.
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C2-95(DLA)
18 Jan 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC A3-94(II)
25 Jan 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CM_20_1994
30 Jan 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CS_343_1994
31 Jan 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC RP_3_1996
1 Feb 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Chief Adjudication Officer v Palfrey and others [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_391_1992
8 Feb 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC A19-94(IVB)
9 Feb 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC CSC 7-94
10 Feb 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Chief Adjudication Officer and Another v Clarke [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_514_1992
14 Feb 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C3/95(IVB)
14 Feb 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC CSC 8/94
14 Feb 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Chief Adjudication Officer v Ellis [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_815_1992
15 Feb 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Chief Adjudication Officer v Clarke; Same v Faul; CA 15-Feb-1995 - Times, 22 February 1995; Independent, 15 February 1995
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CI_189_1994
16 Feb 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Chief Adjudication Officer and Another v Palfrey; Same v Dowell, Same v McDonnell Ind Summary, 10 April 1995; Gazette, 15 March 1995; Times, 17 February 1995
17 Feb 1995
CA
Hobhouse LJ
Benefits
Property was acquired by joint owners to provide accommodation for both joint owners. That purpose would be defeated if one of those acquiring the property were to insist on a sale while that purpose was still subsisting. The value of a joint interest in a house when calculating benefits entitlement was the market value of that half share, not one half of the value of the whole. There was "nothing obscure or abstruse in the conclusion that the amount of capital which the applicant's joint possession of that dwelling house represents may fall, for the time being, to be quantified in a nominal amount." In this case the value was nil.
Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996
1 Citers
Hassall v Secretary of State for Social Security; Pether v Same Gazette, 22 February 1995
22 Feb 1995
CA
Benefits
Claim for loss of non-recoupable benefits should have been made in PI case.
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC A3/95(DLA)
24 Feb 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C6-94(IS)
27 Feb 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Regina v East Yorkshire Borough of Beverley Housing Benefits Review Board Ex Parte Hare Times, 28 February 1995
28 Feb 1995
QBD
Benefits
In comparing rents the term 'rent' is to be construed widely - include service charges.
Kuganathan v Chief Adjudication Officer Gazette, 12 April 1995; Times, 01 March 1995
1 Mar 1995
CA
Benefits
Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to hear appeal from Social Security Appeal Tribunal's refusal of leave to appeal.
Social Security Administration Act 1992 23
Longdon v British Coal Corporation Times, 14 April 1995; Gazette, 12 April 1995
9 Mar 1995
CA
Employment, Personal Injury, Damages, Benefits
A pension paid on incapacity as an alternative to retirement was not deductible from damages payable later for negligence. There was no double recovery.
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_659_1994
13 Mar 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_465_1994
14 Mar 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_400_1994
21 Mar 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_297_1994
22 Mar 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC A2/95(SUPP BEN)
23 Mar 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CCS_2_1994
30 Mar 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CSB_168_1993
5 Apr 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CDLA_192_1994
10 Apr 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Regina v Secretary of State for Social Services Ex Parte Sarwar and Others Times, 19 June 1995; Independent, 12 April 1995
12 Apr 1995
QBD
Benefits
Regulations introducing a 'habitual residence' condition to Income Support were intra vires.
Income Related Benefits Schemes (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 1994 (1994 No 1807) - Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C5-95(IVB)
13 Apr 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C2-95(Supp Ben)
14 Apr 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Regina v Liverpool City Council Ex Parte Muldoon; Regina v Rent Officer Service and Another Ex Parte Kelly Ind Summary, 08 May 1995; Times, 18 April 1995
18 Apr 1995
CA
Benefits
The Secretary of State was not entitled to be served with notice of all Judicial Review applications on benefits. He was not sufficiently directy connected,
1 Citers
(Un-named) (DLA) [1995] UKSSCSC CSDLA_180_1994
19 Apr 1995
SSCS
Benefits
Tribunal practice - appeal in respect of mobility component - whether tribunal obliged to consider existing entitlement to care component - disability living allowance
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) (DB) [1995] UKSSCSC CI_362_1994
24 Apr 1995
SSCS
Benefits
Prescribed disease A10 (occupational deafness) - felling trees in forest area to clear way for roads - whether "forestry" - The claimant claimed disablement benefit in respect of prescribed disease A10 (occupational deafness) on 24 April 1991. From 1978 to March 1991 he had worked for a road construction company. He was employed to clear forest areas, using a chain saw to fell the trees and cut them into logs. He contended that this occupation was prescribed in relation to occupational deafness because it involved "the use of chain saws in forestry" (sub-paragraph (i) of A10). A tribunal allowed the claimant's appeal against the adjudication officer's refusal of his claim. The adjudication officer appealed to a social security Commissioner.
Held that:
the claimant's occupation did not fall within the meaning of "forestry" in paragraph A10 of Part I of Schedule 1 to the Social Security (Industrial Injuries) (Prescribed Diseases) Regulations 1985. His work involved the destruction of forest areas, not the preservation of them. The fact that his work included the cutting down of trees did not mean that his occupation fell within the definition of "forestry" (Meally v. McGowan 39 SLR 662 applied).
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) - R(IS) 3/96 [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_767_1993
25 Apr 1995
SSCS
Benefits
Capital - farm - whether farmland part of "premises" occupied by the claimant's husband
The claimant had lived on a farm of which she was the joint owner with her husband. On 2 July 1992 she went to live in a residential care home on a permanent basis. Her husband continued to live in the farmhouse. Income support was awarded from 2 July 1992. It was later established that the value of the farmland was about £35,000. The land was farmed by a partnership of the claimant's husband and son; it was accepted that the land, which had its own access, could be sold separately from the farmhouse. The adjudication officer reviewed the decision awarding income support, deciding that although the value of the farmhouse could be disregarded under paragraph 4(b) of Schedule 10 to the Income Support (General) Regulations, the value of the farmland could not. The claimant was therefore not entitled to income support because her capital exceeded the prescribed limit of £8,000. The tribunal allowed the claimant's appeal holding that the value of the claimant's interest in the farm was nil as she would be unlikely to find a willing purchaser without her husband's agreement to a sale. The adjudication officer appealed to the Commissioner.
Held that:
"premises" in paragraph 4 of Schedule 10 to the Income Support (General) Regulations was to be interpreted in line with the definition of "dwelling occupied as the home" in regulation 2(1). The first four paragraphs of Schedule 10 were all concerned with disregarding the claimant's home or what would be the home if the claimant was in actual occupation, and thus it was entirely consistent for "premises" in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 to be given a similar interpretation. The tribunal had therefore not erred in law by failing to apply paragraph 4 of Schedule 10 to the whole of the farm;
However the tribunal had erred in law by not considering regulation 52 of the Income Support (General) Regulations. The effect of regulation 52 was to deem the claimant to have an equal undivided share as beneficial tenant in common of the farm (see Chief Adjudication Officer v. Palfrey and para. 49 of CIS/391/1992[R(IS) 26/95]);
although there were grounds for review of the decision to award income support because it was given in ignorance of the facts relating to the claimant's beneficial interest in the farm, the adjudication officer had not shown that the decision to award the claimant income support should be revised (para. 29). The District Valuer's valuation of the claimant's interest seemed to have been based on the revenue approach which was inconsistent with the approach required by paragraphs 53 and 54 of CIS/391/1992 [R(IS) 26/95]. Moreover it was based on an assumption that an order for sale of the farm was likely to be granted but this seemed doubtful in the circumstances. Accordingly the adjudication officer had not shown that the claimant's notional share of the farm had a market value which was sufficient to affect her entitlement to income support;
the claimant was therefore entitled to income support until her death on 2 February 1994
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) - R(U) 1/96 [1995] UKSSCSC CU_151_1993
25 Apr 1995
SSCS
Benefits
Voluntary unemployment - claimant giving notice of resignation but employer requiring her to leave immediately - whether claimant "voluntarily left ... employment without just cause"
The claimant gave her employer four weeks notice on 9 December 1992. On 10 December 1992 the employer informed her that he wished her to leave the next day, 11 December 1992. The adjudication officer decided that the claimant was to be disqualified for receiving unemployment benefit for eight weeks on the ground that she had voluntary left her employment without just cause. The social security appeal tribunal upheld that decision. The claimant appealed to a social security Commissioner.
Held that:
when the claimant gave notice to leave she thereby terminated her employment and this amounted to a voluntary leaving by the claimant. This was not altered by her employer's subsequent action, whether that was to be construed as not requiring her to work out her notice or as a counter-notice. However, the employer's action was highly relevant in deciding the length of the disqualification in this case was one week.
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C4-95(IS)
27 Apr 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC A5/95(IS)
27 Apr 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CI_509_1994
1 May 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C10-94(IS)
1 May 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CG_11_1994
1 May 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_642_1994
3 May 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Cis 472/94 [1995] UKSSCSC 2
4 May 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Chief Adjudication Officer v Sherriff [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_545_1992
4 May 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC A77/95(DLA)
5 May 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Chief Adjudication Officer v Sheriff Times, 10 May 1995
10 May 1995
CA
Benefits
Claimant's inability to comprehend no bar to claim for repayment of overpayment.
Social Security Administration Act 1992
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CCS_9_1994
15 May 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_674_1994
15 May 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CCS_11_1994
15 May 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CF_12_1994
16 May 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CU_96_1994
17 May 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C10/94(DLA)
18 May 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Regina v Social Fund Inspector Ex Parte Ledicott Times, 23 May 1995
23 May 1995
QBD
Benefits
The Social Fund Inspector is to make his decisions basing his opinion on the law as at the date of the appeal not the original determination.
Social Secuirity Administration Act 1992 66(4)
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CF_25_1994
2 Jun 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_101_1994
6 Jun 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Chief Adjudication Officer v Sherriff Gazette, 07 June 1995
7 Jun 1995
CA
Benefits
Repayment claim was allowed for a misrepresentation though claimant was innocent herself.
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CI_414_1994
8 Jun 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC A41/95(IS)
9 Jun 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Secretary of State for Social Security v Fairey Independent, 27 June 1995; Times, 22 June 1995
22 Jun 1995
CA
Benefits
A deaf person can be entitled to disability living allowance for the care needed in order to live a reasonable life.
1 Cites
1 Citers
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC A7/95(IS)
27 Jun 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Rijksdienst voor Arbeidsvoorziening v Van Gestel C-454/93; [1995] EUECJ C-454/93
29 Jun 1995
ECJ
European, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Kaur v Chief Adjudication Officer Independent, 13 July 1995; Times, 05 July 1995
5 Jul 1995
CA
Benefits
A disapplication of the restriction on claiming housing benefit must be for an event which takes place after the claim. Wife not entitled to more mortgage support benefit than had been paid as housing benefit.
Income Support (General) Regulations 1987 10-1
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_450_1994
7 Jul 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CCR_2_1994
13 Jul 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Meyers v Chief Adjudication Officer C-116/94 Ecj [1995] UKSSCSC CFC_19_1990
13 Jul 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Meyers v Adjudication Officer; ECJ 19-Jul-1995 - Times, 19 July 1995; Ind Summary, 11 September 1995; C-116/94; [1995] EUECJ C-116/94; [1995] ECR I-2131
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C30-95(DLA)
26 Jul 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CI_420_1994
2 Aug 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C11-95(IS)
4 Aug 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C34-95(DLA)
4 Aug 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C12-95(IS)
7 Aug 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C1-93(CRS)
8 Aug 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Secretary of State for Social Services and Anor v Graham and others [1995] UKSSCSC CS_27_1991
11 Aug 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Secretary of State for Social Security and Chief Adjudication Officer v Graham and others); ECJ 11-Aug-1995 - Times, 25 September 1995; Ind Summary, 09 October 1995; C-92/94; [1995] EUECJ C-92/94
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_719_1994
15 Aug 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC A103/95(DLA)
23 Aug 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC A10/95(IS)
25 Aug 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_392_1994
25 Aug 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_600_1995
31 Aug 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C1-95(UB)
12 Sep 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C26-95(DLA)
14 Sep 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C5-95(IS)
14 Sep 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_317_1994
27 Sep 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CI_696_1994
27 Sep 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Delavant v Allgemeine Orstkrankenkasse Fur Da Saarland Times, 03 October 1995; C-451/93; [1995] EUECJ C-451/93
3 Oct 1995
ECJ
Benefits, European
Resident in one country injured at work in another may claim benefits there.
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_543_1993
4 Oct 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_461_1994
13 Oct 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_1067_1995
16 Oct 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Olivieri-Coenen v Bestuur van de Nieuwe Algemene Bedrijfsvereniging C-227/94; [1995] EUECJ C-227/94
17 Oct 1995
ECJ
European, Benefits
ECJ Point 4(a) of the section on the Netherlands contained in Annex V of Regulation No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community, in the version applicable as from 1 February 1982, is to be interpreted as meaning that periods of paid employment include periods in which a person worked as a teacher under a contract of employment concluded with a private educational establishment, even if that person was insured during that period under a special scheme for civil servants and persons treated as such excluded from the scope of the regulation. If the period of paid employment subject in that way to that special scheme was not treated as a period of insurance for the purposes of Annex V to the regulation, the person completing it would thereby suffer a disadvantage contrary to Article 51 of the Treaty, whereas to take that period into account does not entail any overlapping of different entitlements.
[ Bailii ]
Chief Adjudication Officer v Kenyon [1995] UKSSCSC CA_215_1992
17 Oct 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CCS_100_1995
19 Oct 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Regina v Secretary of State for Health, ex parte Richardson Independent, 17 November 1995; Times, 27 October 1995; C-137/94; [1995] EUECJ C-137/94
19 Oct 1995
ECJ
Benefits, Discrimination, European
ECJ Different ages for prescription charges between sexes were an unlawful discrimination. Pension differences were no justification for different eligibility for prescription.
Council Directive 79/7/EEC
[ Bailii ]
Puglia v C James and Sons [1995] UKEAT 777_93_2410; [1996] ICR 301; [1996] IRLR 70
24 Oct 1995
EAT
Mummery J
Employment, Benefits
The EAT considered the effect of the receipt of benefits during a period of sickness when calculating loss of earnings, and whether a hearing was properly conducted without the presence of the parties. Held. There is no procedural irregularity in the Tribunal members holding a meeting in the absence of the parties for the purposes of reaching their decision on evidence and argument already before them.
As to the affect of the receipt of statutory sick pay: "In our judgment, the industrial tribunal correctly applied the law in deducting from the estimated loss of earnings the statutory sick pay received by Mr Puglia over the relevant period. The law on this topic was settled by the Appeal Tribunal in Sun & Sand Ltd v Fitzjohn [1979] IRLR 154 . . It was not suggested in this case that Mr Puglia's contract of employment provided that he would be entitled to his full wages in addition to any statutory sick pay which he received. The industrial tribunal were therefore correct in making a deduction for the statutory sick pay received by Mr Puglia."
1 Cites
1 Citers
[ Bailii ]
Moscato v Bestuur van de Nieuwe Algemene Bedrijfsvereniging C-481/93; [1995] EUECJ C-481/93
26 Oct 1995
ECJ
Benefits
Social security - Invalidity - Legislation applicable - Type A legislation - Pre-existing state of health.
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C16-95(IS)
31 Oct 1995
NISSCS
Benefits
Income Support
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_117_1995
1 Nov 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC A33/95(IS)
3 Nov 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CF_19_1994
3 Nov 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) (Income Support) [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_1460_1995
9 Nov 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) (Attendance Allowance) [1995] NISSCSC C2-95(AA)
13 Nov 1995
NISSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Chief Adjudication Officer v Kenyon and Others Times, 14 November 1995
14 Nov 1995
CA
Benefits
Attendance allowance payable to elderly making own residential care arrangements.
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C20/95(IS)
21 Nov 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Mulvey v Secretary of State for Social Security; IHCS 24-Nov-1995 - Times, 24 November 1995; 1996 SC 8
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CCS_4_1994
6 Dec 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CSSB_6_1995
7 Dec 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC C48-95(DLA)
7 Dec 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Franklin v Chief Adjudication Officer [1995] UKSSCSC CIS_145_1994
13 Dec 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
(Un-named) [1995] UKSSCSC CSIS_8_1995
18 Dec 1995
SSCS
Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Steane and Another v Chief Adjudication Officer and Another Times, 19 December 1995; Ind Summary, 08 January 1996
19 Dec 1995
CA
Benefits
Attendance allowance could be granted to a care resident who didn't apply via the Local Authority Social Services department.
Attendance allowance payable to elderly person on transfer of nursing home into the private sector.
Social Security (Attendance Allowance)(No 2) Regulations 1975/598 - National Assistance Act 1948
1 Citers
Regina v Kensington and Chelsea Royal Borough Council Ex Parte Brandt; QBD 21-Dec-1995 - Times, 21 December 1995
(Un-named) [1995] NISSCSC CSC 2-95
22 Dec 1995
NISSCS
Northern Ireland, Benefits
[ Bailii ]
Franklin v Chief Adjudication Officer; CA 29-Dec-1995 - Times, 29 December 1995
