

Links: Home \| swarblaw - law discussions		swarb.co.uk - law index These cases are from the lawindexpro database. They are now being transferred to the swarb.co.uk website in a better form. As a case is published there, an entry here will link to it. The swarb.co.uk site includes many later cases. Â
		Benefits - From: 1992 To: 1992 This page lists 65 cases, and was prepared on 03 April 2018. Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CA_512_1990 14 Jan 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_578_1990 14 Jan 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] NISSCSC C1/92(SB) 20 Jan 1992 NISSCS Northern Ireland, Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1993] NISSCSC A1/93(SB) 21 Jan 1992 NISSCS Northern Ireland, Benefits [ Bailii ] Â Regina v Social Security Commissioner ex parte Akbar Gazette, 29 January 1992 29 Jan 1992 QBD Benefits 'Temporary absence' from the country did not require there to be an intended fixed date of return to be known at start of the absence, and a claim for benefits was not thereby defeated. The word must be given its ordinary and natural meaning, which is 'not permanent'. Social Security Act 1975 12 - Social Security Benefit (Persons Abroad) Regulations 1975 (1975 No 563) 2(1) Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_379_1991 3 Feb 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CP_45_1990 26 Feb 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CS_8_90 2 Mar 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CSSB_53_1991 3 Mar 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â Chief Adjudication Officer v Twomey [1992] UKSSCSC CS_78_1989 10 Mar 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â Regina v National Insurance Commissioner, ex parte Secretary of State for Social Services [1992] UKSSCSC CA_0092_1992 10 Mar 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â Chief Adjudication Office v Dommett [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_100_1989 12 Mar 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] NISSCSC A9/92(MOB) 16 Mar 1992 NISSCS Northern Ireland, Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CFC_15_1990 16 Mar 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_242_1989 17 Mar 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â Â Doriguzzi-Zordanin v Landesversicherungsanstalt Schwaben; ECJ 19-Mar-1992 - C-188/90; [1992] EUECJ C-188/90 Â Secretary of State v Julien [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_542_1990 2 Apr 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_195_1991 8 Apr 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] NISSCSC C3/91(IS) 15 Apr 1992 NISSCS Northern Ireland, Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_277_1989 23 Apr 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_191_1991 23 Apr 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_620_1991 30 Apr 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_270_1991 28 May 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CI_266_1991 11 Jun 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CFC_20_1991 11 Jun 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC R[G]_294 11 Jun 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â Secretary of State v Scully [1992] UKSSCSC CS_83_1989 12 Jun 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â Chief Adjudication Officer v Pearse [1992] UKSSCSC CP_64_1988 12 Jun 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CG_10_1991 24 Jun 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_107_1991 30 Jun 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_654_1991 8 Jul 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_85_1991 9 Jul 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â Jackson and Cresswell v Chief Adjudication Officer (Judgment) C-63/91; [1992] EUECJ C-63/91 16 Jul 1992 ECJ European, Benefits, Discrimination Europa Article 3(1) of Directive 79/7 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security, which defines the matters covered by the directive, is to be interpreted as not referring to a statutory scheme which, on certain conditions, provides persons with means below a legally defined limit with a special benefit designed to enable them to meet their needs. That interpretation is not affected by the circumstance that the claimant is suffering from one of the risks listed in Article 3 of the directive. Directive 76/207 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions is to be interpreted as meaning that the fact that, under a social security scheme which, on certain conditions, provides persons with means below a legally defined limit with a special benefit designed to enable them to meet their needs, the conditions of entitlement for receipt of the benefits may be such as to affect the ability of a single parent to take up access to vocational training or part-time employment is not sufficient to bring that scheme within its scope. [ Bailii ] Â Hughes v Chief Adjudication Officer (Judgment) C-78/91; [1992] EUECJ C-78/91 16 Jul 1992 ECJ European, Benefits Europa Social security for migrant workers ° Community rules ° Scope ratione materiae ° Benefits covered and benefits excluded ° Criteria for distinguishing ° Benefit intended to meet the claimant' s family expenses and granted on the basis of objective, legally-defined criteria ° Included ° Non-contributory benefit ° No effect (Council Regulation No 1408/71, Art. 4(1)(h)) 2. Social security for migrant workers ° Family benefits ° Employed person subject to the legislation of one Member State but resident with his family in another Member State ° Derived right of spouse to the family benefits provided for by the legislation to which the worker is subject ° Conditions (Council Regulation No 1408/71, Art. 73). [ Bailii ] Â Cresswell v Chief Adjudication Officer [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_146_1990 16 Jul 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CG_5_1991 20 Aug 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_18_1990 4 Sep 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_255_1989 7 Sep 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_254_1989 7 Sep 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1993] NISSCSC C1/93(SUPP BEN) 10 Sep 1992 NISSCS Northern Ireland, Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1993] NISSCSC C1/93(SUPP BEN) 10 Sep 1992 NISSCS Northern Ireland, Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_360_1991 14 Sep 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CSB_260_1990 15 Sep 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CP_70_1989 23 Sep 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_42_1992 30 Sep 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_175_1991 2 Oct 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CI_253_1992 7 Oct 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CSA_49_1991 9 Oct 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CP_46_1990 29 Oct 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_754_1991 11 Nov 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CS_130_1990 11 Nov 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CSIS_65_1991 17 Nov 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_375_1992 17 Nov 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] NISSCSC A17/92(IVB) 19 Nov 1992 NISSCS Northern Ireland, Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CG_571_1991 19 Nov 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1993] NISSCSC C4/93(SUPP BEN) 23 Nov 1992 NISSCS Northern Ireland, Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1993] NISSCSC C4/93(SUPP BEN) 23 Nov 1992 NISSCS Northern Ireland, Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CSU_14_1990 25 Nov 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_690_1991 1 Dec 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_428_1991 2 Dec 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) R(I) 3/93 [1992] UKSSCSC CI_117_1992 7 Dec 1992 SSCS Benefits Reduced earnings allowance - claimants ceasing regular employment before 10 April 1989 - whether to be treated as "not having given up regular employment" [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) [1992] UKSSCSC CIS_303_1992 10 Dec 1992 SSCS Benefits [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) (Family Credit) [1992] UKSSCSC CFC_16_1991 16 Dec 1992 SSCS Benefits Presence condition - claimant's partner's earnings derived from remunerative work outside the United Kingdom - whether claimant to be treated as not being in Great Britain [ Bailii ] Â (Un-named) Disablement benefit [1992] UKSSCSC CI_81_1990 16 Dec 1992 SSCS Benefits Disablement benefit - whether disabilities arising subsequent to an accident can be included in the assessment of disablement [ Bailii ] Â Josu Miguel Dyaz Garcya v European Parliament T-43/90; [1992] EUECJ T-43/90 18 Dec 1992 ECFI European, Children, Benefits ECJ 1. Under Article 2(4) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations, the treatment, as a dependent child, of a person whom an official has a legal responsibility to maintain and whose maintenance involves heavy expenditure constitutes an exceptional step. The condition that the official must have a legal responsibility to maintain a person other than a dependent child must for that reason be interpreted strictly. The concept of "a legal responsibility to maintain" used in the Staff Regulations is derived from the legal systems of the Member States, which, under their laws, impose a mutual responsibility to provide maintenance on relatives by blood and/or marriage of a greater or lesser degree of proximity. That concept must therefore be understood as referring exclusively to an obligation maintenance imposed on an official by a source of law independent of the will of the parties and as excluding maintenance obligations of a contractual, moral or compensatory nature. Since neither Community law nor the Staff Regulations provide the Community court with any guide as to how it should define, by way of independent interpretation, the meaning and scope of a legal responsibility to maintain, entitling an official to receive a dependent child allowance under Article 2(4) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations, it is necessary to determine whether the national legal system to which the official in question is subject imposes such a legal responsibility on the official. 2. The terms of a provision of Community law which makes no express reference to the laws of the Member States for the purpose of determining its meaning and scope must normally be given an independent interpretation, which must take into account the context of the provision and the purpose of the relevant regulations. In the absence of an express reference to the laws of the Member States, the application of Community law may sometimes necessitate a reference to the laws of the Member States where the Community court cannot identify in Community law or in the general principles of Community law criteria enabling it to define the meaning and scope of such a provision by way of independent interpretation. 3. An official has no legitimate interest in the annulment of a decision for breach of procedural requirements where the administration has no scope for the exercise of discretion but is bound to act as it has done. In such a case, the annulment of the contested decision could lead only to the adoption of another decision identical in substance to the decision annulled. [ Bailii ] Â
		Copyright 2014 David Swarbrick, 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse, West Yorkshire HD6 2AG.

swarb.co.uk - law index

Benefits - From: 1992 To: 1992