Site icon swarb.co.uk

Lauder v Lauder: FD 21 Mar 2007

W appealed against the variation of periodical payments order.
Held: The court will not generally expect W to apply inherited capital (as opposed to the income generated therefrom) to the meeting of her maintenance needs.

Judges:

Baron J

Citations:

[2007] EWHC 1227 (Fam), [2008] 3 FCR 468, [2007] 2 FLR 802

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedCordle v Cordle CA 15-Nov-2001
The former practice in ancillary relief applications where a circuit judge hearing an appeal from a district judge could admit new evidence and hear the case de novo should not survive the new rules, and should cease. An appeal to the circuit judge . .

Cited by:

CitedVaughan v Vaughan CA 31-Mar-2010
H had been paying maintenance to W for many years after the divorce. W now appealed against an order revoking the arrangement without providing a capital sum to replace it. H’s health had declined, and also his earnings.
Held: W’s appeal . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Family

Updated: 11 July 2022; Ref: scu.253471

Exit mobile version