Landlord Protect Ltd v St Anselm Development Company Ltd: ChD 8 Jul 2008

Hodge QC J
[2008] EWHC 1582 (Ch), [2008] NPC 82, [2008] 28 EG 113 (CS)
Landlord and Tenant Act 1988 1(6)(b)
England and Wales
CitedReid Minty (a firm) v Taylor CA 2002
The defendant had successfully defended the main claim and now appealed against the refusal of an order for costs on an indemnity basis even though judge thought that the claimants had behaved unreasonably. He had said that some conduct deserving of . .

Cited by:
Appeal fromLandlord Protect Ltd v St Anselm Development Company Ltd CA 20-Feb-2009
Guarantee beyond term was unreasonable
The tenant objected that the landlord’s conditional consent to an assignment was unreasonable. The purchaser was a dormant company which had never traded. The clause referred to ‘a respectable and responsible assignee or sub-tenant’. The tenant had . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 08 February 2021; Ref: scu.270707