Site icon swarb.co.uk

L Batley Pet Products Ltd v North Lanarkshire Council: SCS 20 Dec 2011

(Outer House) The pursuers were mid-tenants and the responders their sub-tenants. Before the expiry of the sub-lease, the pursuer reqested re-instatement, but the responder now said that thie notice should have been formal to be effective.
Held: Batley had pleaded a relevant case because she construed clause 2.5 of the Minute of Agreement as allowing Batley to communicate orally that it required the reinstatement of the sub-let premises. She allowed the parties a proof before answer of their averments. Per incuriam in her interlocutor of 20 December 2011 she repelled the Council’s plea to the relevancy.

Judges:

Morag Wise QC

Citations:

[2011] ScotCS CSOH – 209

Links:

Bailii

Cited by:

Outer HouseBatley Pet Products v North Lanarkshire Council SCS 7-Nov-2012
(Extra Division) The mid-landlord had requested the sub-tenant to execute repairs before the lease expired. The tenant said that the requirement should have been notified formally to create an obligation. The landlord now appealed against a finding . .
Outer HouseL Batley Pet Products Ltd v North Lanarkshire Council SC 8-May-2014
The appellant was mid-landlord and the respondent the sub-tenant under a now-expired lease. The appellant had wanted repairs to be executed but told the tenant informally. The tenant argued that the lease required formal notice to create an . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Scotland, Landlord and Tenant

Updated: 04 October 2022; Ref: scu.450138

Exit mobile version