(Outer House) The pursuers were mid-tenants and the responders their sub-tenants. Before the expiry of the sub-lease, the pursuer reqested re-instatement, but the responder now said that thie notice should have been formal to be effective.
Held: Batley had pleaded a relevant case because she construed clause 2.5 of the Minute of Agreement as allowing Batley to communicate orally that it required the reinstatement of the sub-let premises. She allowed the parties a proof before answer of their averments. Per incuriam in her interlocutor of 20 December 2011 she repelled the Council’s plea to the relevancy.
Judges:
Morag Wise QC
Citations:
[2011] ScotCS CSOH – 209
Links:
Cited by:
Outer House – Batley Pet Products v North Lanarkshire Council SCS 7-Nov-2012
(Extra Division) The mid-landlord had requested the sub-tenant to execute repairs before the lease expired. The tenant said that the requirement should have been notified formally to create an obligation. The landlord now appealed against a finding . .
Outer House – L Batley Pet Products Ltd v North Lanarkshire Council SC 8-May-2014
The appellant was mid-landlord and the respondent the sub-tenant under a now-expired lease. The appellant had wanted repairs to be executed but told the tenant informally. The tenant argued that the lease required formal notice to create an . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Scotland, Landlord and Tenant
Updated: 04 October 2022; Ref: scu.450138