Skip to content

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

Law
- More Recent Cases
- e-Legal Gathering
- Case Layout
- FAQ
- Searching
- Areas of Law
- law index
- Courts
- Reports
- Judges
- Case Names
Privacy
About
Advertising
Registration

Kuster v Parliament (Judgment): ECJ 10 Jul 1975

Citations:

C-77/74, [1975] EUECJ C-77/74

Links:

European

Updated: 21 May 2022; Ref: scu.132160

Posted on May 21, 2022May 21, 2022 by dlsPosted in European

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Meinhardt v Commission (Judgment): ECJ 17 May 1972

Next Next post: Opinion 1/75: ECJ 11 Nov 1975

Search for:

Areas of Law:

Recent Posts

Davis v Dessian Products Ltd: NIIT 24 Feb 2005
Atkinson v Morrow and Another (T/A Quality Cleaning Service): NIIT 7 Feb 2005
Garrett v Police Service for Northern Ireland: NIIT 27 Jan 2005
In re GHE Realisations Ltd (In Administration): ChD 4 Nov 2005
Brown v Hudson and others: ChD 21 Oct 2005
Customs v K&L Childcare Service Ltd.: ChD 4 Nov 2005
Home Insurance Company, Re: ChD 10 Nov 2005
Finecard International Ltd (T/A the Ninja Corporation) v Urquhart Dyke and Lord (A Firm) and Another: ChD 10 Nov 2005
Cheverny Consulting Ltd v Whitehead Mann Ltd: ChD 8 Nov 2005
Council for the Regulation of Health Care Professionals v the Nursing and Midwifery Council and Another: QBNI 25 Oct 2005
Re K and P: FDNI 7 Nov 2005
Re E: FDNI 7 Nov 2005
Anton Durbeck Gmbh v Den Norske Bank Asa: ComC 11 Nov 2005
Asia Pacific (Hk) Ltd. and others v Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd (Hanjin Pennsylvania): ComC 7 Nov 2005
Sawyer v Atari Interactive Inc: ChD 1 Nov 2005
Blair and Another v WGG Residential Ltd and others: QBNI 24 Oct 2005
Svenska Petroleum Exploration Ab v Lithuania and Another (No 2): ComC 4 Nov 2005
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd v Fielding and others: ChD 11 Nov 2005
Stichting Zuid-Hollandse Milieufederatie v College voor de toelating van bestrijdingsmiddelen: ECJ 10 Nov 2005
Slaney v Culina Logistick Gmbh T/A Cullina Logistics: EAT 21 Oct 2005
Stock and others v First Secretary of State and Another: Admn 28 May 2004
Commission v Portugal C-432/03: ECJ 10 Nov 2005
Commission v United Kingdom C-385/04: ECJ 10 Nov 2005
Commission v Germany – C-197/04: ECJ 10 Nov 2005
Italy v Commission C-307/03: ECJ 10 Nov 2005
Environmental Tyre Disposals Ltd, Regina v: CACD 13 Oct 2005
Rogers, Regina v: CACD 10 Nov 2005
Regina v Nicholas Vernon Stansfield, Christopher Lennon Stansfield: CACD 10 Nov 2005
Cwik v Commission: ECFI 25 Oct 2005
Horner, Regina (on the Application Of) v Castle Cement Ltd.: Admn 19 Jul 2005
Harb v King Fahd Bin Abdul Aziz and Another: CA 9 Nov 2005
Jakto Transport Ltd. v Derek Hall: CA 9 Nov 2005
Clear Channel UK Ltd v Manchester City Council: CA 9 Nov 2005
Wedlake, Regina (on the Application Of) v First Secretary of State and Another: Admn 30 Sep 2005
Commission v United Kingdom: ECJ 20 Oct 2005
Renda, Regina v; Regina v Ball; Regina v Akram etc: CACD 10 Nov 2005
Levob Verzekeringen and Ov Bank v Staatssecretaris van Financien: ECJ 27 Oct 2005
Re W (A Child): CA 13 Oct 2005
Ryde v London Borough of Enfield: CA 13 Oct 2005
Sinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington) Ltd, Regina (on the Application of) v The Lands Tribunal: CA 8 Nov 2005
Gillon v Her Majesty’s Advocate: HCJ 29 Sep 2005
Sisu Capital Fund Ltd and others v Tucker and others: 28 Oct 2005
Wright v Her Majesty’s Advocate: HCJ 25 Oct 2005
Her Majesty’s Advocate v Cameron and Another: HCJ 28 Oct 2005
The Barns (NE) Ltd. and Another v Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: CA 11 Oct 2005
Petroleo Brasileiro SA and Another v Petromec Inc and others: ComC 3 Nov 2005
Et Plus Sa and others v Welter and others: ComC 7 Nov 2005
Primetrade Ag v Ythan Ltd: ComC 1 Nov 2005
Zubrytska for Judicial Review of A Determination of an Adjudicator and A Determination of the Immigration Appeal Tribunal: OHCS 2 Nov 2005
Logan v Scottish Water: OHCS 1 Nov 2005

Meta

Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.org

swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

Search for:

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.