The Court will hear an action which is connected with a gambling transaction if the connection is merely collateral or incidental.
Citations:
(1892) 19 R 959
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Robertson v Anderson IHCS 5-Dec-2002
The parties had agreed to share any winnings from their Bingo activities. One sought to reject the contract as an unenforceable gaming contract.
Held: The contention was rejected. It had been suggested that there had been no intention to . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Contract
Updated: 06 December 2022; Ref: scu.181871