Site icon swarb.co.uk

Kings College London (Education): ICO 14 Jul 2020

The complainant has requested information relating to ‘Comparison of adaptive pacing therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, graded exercise therapy, and specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome (PACE): a randomised trial’. KCL refused to disclose some of the requested information under section 22A and 40(2) FOIA and argued that some of the requested information either was not held by KCL or alternatively it would exceed the cost limit under section 12 FOIA to locate, retrieve and extract it. The Commissioner’s decision is that section 22A FOIA was applied correctly to some of the requested information and it would exceed the cost limit under section 12 FOIA to locate, retrieve and extract the remaining requested information. The Commissioner requires no steps to be taken.
FOI 22A: Complaint not upheld FOI 12: Complaint not upheld

Citations:

[2020] UKICO fs50867390

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Information

Updated: 22 July 2022; Ref: scu.653761

Exit mobile version