The claimant asserted that he had taken a transfer of the house from his daughter and son in law. They said the transfer had been procured by misrepresentation and undue influence. The claimant now sought a stay of an order for payment of costs pending the appeal against the county court judge’s order.
Sir Christopher Staughton
 EWCA Civ 1471
England and Wales
See Also – Turkey v Awadh and Another CA 8-Mar-2005
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.219661