Site icon swarb.co.uk

Karlheinz Schmidt v Germany: ECHR 18 Jul 1994

Article 14 of the Convention operates not by way of the conferral of a freestanding right not to be discriminated against, but rather by way of complementing the other substantive provisions of the Convention and the Protocols. It has no independent existence, since it has effect solely in relation to the enjoyment of the rights and freedoms safeguarded by those other provisions.

Citations:

[1994] ECHR 22, 13580/88, [1994] 18 EHRR 513

Links:

Worldlii, Bailii

Statutes:

European Convention on Human Rghts 14

Cited by:

CitedPetrovic v Austria ECHR 27-Mar-1998
The applicant was refused a grant of parental leave allowance in 1989. At that time parental leave allowance was available only to mothers. The applicant complained that this violated article 14 taken together with article 8.
Held: The . .
CitedSecretary of State for the Home Department v Hindawi and Headley CA 13-Oct-2004
The applicant was a foreign national serving a long-term prison sentence. He complained that UK nationals would have had their case referred to the parole board before his.
Held: The right to be referred to the parole board was a statutory . .
CitedCatholic Care (Diocese of Leeds) v Charity Commission for England and Wales and Another ChD 17-Mar-2010
The charity appealed against refusal of permission to amend its charitable objects as set out in the memorandum of association. The charity was successful as an adoption agency particularly in placing children who would otherwise have had difficulty . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Human Rights, Discrimination

Updated: 04 June 2022; Ref: scu.165330

Exit mobile version