Skip to content

swarb.co.uk

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

  • Law
    • More Recent Cases
    • e-Legal Gathering
    • Case Layout
    • FAQ
    • Searching
    • Areas of Law
    • law index
    • Courts
    • Reports
    • Judges
    • Case Names
  • Privacy
    • GDPR – Overall
    • Anonymity Orders
    • GDPR – Request to be ‘Forgotten’
    • Privacy – Users
    • GDPR – Content
    • GDPR – Legitimate Interests
    • Lawfulness of processing
    • Purposes Limitation
    • Cookie Policy
    • GDPR -Accuracy
    • GDPR – Resources
    • California Consumer Privacy Act
  • About
    • What we do
    • Contact
    • Development
  • Advertising
    • Advertising
    • Donate
    • Statistics
  • Registration

Juskelis, R v: CACD 8 Nov 2016

Citations:

[2016] EWCA Crim 1817

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Crime

Updated: 28 January 2022; Ref: scu.573354

Posted on January 29, 2022January 29, 2022 by dlsPosted in CrimeTagged Crime

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Lama (Video Recorded Evidence – Weight – Art 8 ECHRr): UTIAC 13 Jan 2017
Next Next post: Stryjak v London Borough of Hounslow and Others: Admn 6 Jul 2016

Areas of Law:

  • Administrative (1,122)
  • Adoption (461)
  • Agency (620)
  • Agriculture (773)
  • Animals (305)
  • Arbitration (1,262)
  • Armed Forces (358)
  • Banking (1,416)
  • Benefits (3,516)
  • Capital Gains Tax (486)
  • Charity (383)
  • Child Support (309)
  • Children (5,385)
  • Civil Procedure Rules (307)
  • Commercial (1,423)
  • Commonwealth (3,082)
  • Company (3,025)
  • Constitutional (949)
  • Construction (1,171)
  • Consumer (740)
  • Contempt of Court (824)
  • Contract (6,113)
  • Coroners (421)
  • Corporation Tax (680)
  • Costs (3,550)
  • Crime (8,397)
  • Criminal Evidence (633)
  • Criminal Practice (3,314)
  • Criminal Sentencing (2,787)
  • Customs and Excise (1,686)
  • Damages (2,486)
  • Defamation (1,543)
  • Development (1)
  • Discrimination (2,629)
  • Ecclesiastical (307)
  • Education (1,063)
  • Elections (224)
  • Employment (12,721)
  • Environment (820)
  • Equity (961)
  • Estoppel (334)
  • European (12,941)
  • Evidence (517)
  • Extradition (1,589)
  • Family (2,883)
  • Financial Services (1,014)
  • Health (1,522)
  • Health and Safety (459)
  • Health Professions (1,928)
  • Housing (2,001)
  • Human Rights (19,659)
  • Immigration (56,354)
  • Income Tax (3,224)
  • Information (15,623)
  • Inheritance Tax (178)
  • Insolvency (3,044)
  • Insurance (1,249)
  • Intellectual Property (13,534)
  • International (956)
  • Ireland (18)
  • Judicial Review (584)
  • Jurisdiction (1,047)
  • Jury (1,553)
  • Land (5,293)
  • Landlord and Tenant (15,656)
  • Legal Aid (391)
  • Legal Professions (1,957)
  • Licensing (594)
  • Limitation (1,064)
  • Litigation Practice (7,051)
  • Local Government (1,630)
  • Magistrates (758)
  • Media (1,141)
  • Natural Justice (322)
  • Negligence (1,336)
  • News (49)
  • Northern Ireland (1,757)
  • Nuisance (460)
  • Personal Injury (2,906)
  • Planning (3,239)
  • Police (1,549)
  • Prisons (1,248)
  • Professional Negligence (1,619)
  • Rating (670)
  • Registered Land (823)
  • Road Traffic (1,211)
  • Scotland (16,745)
  • Stamp Duty (187)
  • Taxes – Other (2,256)
  • Taxes Management (1,381)
  • Torts – Other (2,759)
  • Transport (2,049)
  • Trusts (1,473)
  • Undue Influence (152)
  • Utilities (477)
  • VAT (5,534)
  • Vicarious Liability (248)
  • Wales (16)
  • Wills and Probate (1,781)

Recent Posts

  • Regina v East Sussex County Council ex parte Beth Tandy: Admn 23 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Wood: Admn 22 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Social Security Commissioner ex parte Maurice Boyer: Admn 21 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Joseph Jonah: Admn 21 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Ehsan Hamid and others: Admn 21 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Wellingborough Magistrates’ Court ex parte Alan Thomas Monk: Admn 18 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Somerset County Council, ARC Southern Limited ex parte Richard Dixon: Admn 18 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Chukwudi Obi: Admn 18 Apr 1997
  • Regina v London Borough of Newham ex parte Tracy Jenner: Admn 18 Apr 1997
  • Queen v London Borough of Islington ex parte Dionne Celine Thomas: Admn 18 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Nicholas Gwyn Elkins: Admn 18 Apr 1997
  • In the Matter of Chetta (2): Admn 18 Apr 1997
  • In the Matter of Chamseddine Maaroufi: Admn 18 Apr 1997
  • In Re Chetta: Admn 18 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Immigration Appeal Tribunal ex parte Kaur: Admn 18 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Warrington Justices ex parte Guest: Admn 17 Apr 1997
  • Regina v South Humberside Health Authority ex parte Trivedi: Admn 17 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Lincoln Crown Court ex parte David Andrew Jude: Admn 17 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Lewes Crown Court ex parte Barton: Admn 17 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Bishop’s Stortford Justices ex parte Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 17 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Birmingham Justices ex parte Patrick: Admn 17 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Benjamin Mark Carte, Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 17 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Mojisola Ogunsola: Admn 16 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Liverpool City Council ex parte F: Admn 16 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Immigration Appeals Tribunal and Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Mary Nyonkabi Mwania: Admn 16 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Gravesend Magistrates Court ex parte Baker: Admn 16 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Special Adjudicator ex parte Imran Arshad: Admn 15 Apr 1997
  • Secretary of State for Transport Vehicle Inspectorate v Shane Raymond Nuttall T/a Redline Coaches: Admn 15 Apr 1997
  • Regina v London Borough of Islington ex parte Nelson: Admn 15 Apr 1997
  • In the Matter of Serif Systems Limited: Admn 15 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Immigration Appellate Authority ex parte Azzedine Bellache: Admn 15 Apr 1997
  • Director of Public Prosecutions v Michael Harold David Harper: Admn 15 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Bristol Crown Court ex parte Wilfred Holden (Blackburn) Ltd: Admn 15 Apr 1997
  • Bramham v Chief Constable of Norfolk Constabulary: Admn 14 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Russell: Admn 14 Apr 1997
  • Nidderdale Building Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Customs and Excise: Admn 14 Apr 1997
  • Regina v London Borough of Camden ex parte Teklia: Admn 14 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Liverpool Crown Court and Crown Prosecution Service ex parte Simon Stuart Clarke: Admn 14 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board ex parte Piercy: Admn 14 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Aruna Lamin Sesay: Admn 11 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Secretary of Home Department ex parte Hamid Habibi: Admn 11 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte John Babatunde Odunukan; Regina v Secretary of State for Home Department Rosette Mesa Masaka: Admn 11 Apr 1997
  • Queen v Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Jamal Abdul Nasir: Admn 11 Apr 1997
  • In the Matter of Boutrus Abdul Aziz Al-Salaam; In the Matter of an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Subjiciendum, In the Matter of Extradition Act 1989, In the Matter of United States of America (Extradition) Order S 1 No 2144 of 1976: Admn 11 Apr 1997
  • Holden v Hearing Aid Council: Admn 11 Apr 1997
  • Director of Public Prosecutions v Gabriel Sheila Murphy: Admn 11 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Swansea Crown Court ex parte Ian Paul Jones: Admn 10 Apr 1997
  • Regina v London Borough of Newham ex parte Vadim Plastin: Admn 10 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Lancashire County Council ex parte Rachel Sellers and Judith Petty: Admn 10 Apr 1997
  • Regina v Attorney General ex parte Tejendrasingh: Admn 10 Apr 1997

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.