EAT Victimisation Discrimination : Health and Safety
The Respondent rostered the Claimant to work nine consecutive nights and dismissed him after he complained. Under WTR Reg 11 this pattern is apparently not unlawful. The Employment Tribunal failed to consider whether the Claimant reasonably believed it was, concluding that, since it was not unlawful, no-one could think otherwise. The Respondent changed its reason for dismissal. Appeal allowed and remitted to fresh Employment Tribunal.
Judges:
McMullen QC J
Citations:
[2011] UKEAT 11 – 0210 – 1110
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 29 September 2022; Ref: scu.449409