EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Appellate jurisdiction/reasons/Burns-Barke
Costs
On appeal, the EAT was not concerned with appeals against spent interim orders, after a substantive judgment: Edem applied. The Employment Tribunal was entitled to dismiss the Claimant’s five claims. The EAT would not interfere with the Employment Tribunal’s discretion to award costs against her, noting she was a barrister with special experience in employment law: Arrowsmith applied.
McMullen QC J
[2012] UKEAT 1247 – 10 – 1104
Bailii
England and Wales
Updated: 19 July 2021; Ref: scu.459927 br>