Site icon swarb.co.uk

Jackson Grundy Estate Agents v Hall: EAT 15 Jan 2010

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Appellate jurisdiction/reasons/Burns-Barke
SEX DISCRIMINATION: Pregnancy and discrimination
Meek-compliance – Failure by Employment Tribunal to explain why they preferred the evidence of one witness to another on a crucial factual issue. Observations of Morison P in Tchoula approved by the Court of Appeal in Anya (para 24) applied.
Case remitted to fresh employment tribunal for rehearing on issue of sex discrimination.

Citations:

[2010] UKEAT 0423 – 09 – 1501

Links:

Bailii

Citing:

CitedDr Anya v University of Oxford and Another CA 22-Mar-2001
Discrimination – History of interactions relevant
When a tribunal considered whether the motive for an act was discriminatory, it should look not just at the act, but should make allowance for earlier acts which might throw more light on the act in question. The Tribunal should assess the totality . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 14 August 2022; Ref: scu.401635

Exit mobile version