Site icon swarb.co.uk

Iustin Robertino Micu v Romania: ECHR 13 Jan 2015

The applicant alleged, in particular, that his rights guaranteed by Article 3, 5 and 13 of the Convention, whether regarded separately or together, had been breached because he had been unable to obtain access to food in spite of his medical condition and he had been unlawfully deprived of his liberty for the period he spent under the control of a police officer and at the National Anticorruption Department’s Office for questioning prior to his placement in police custody. In addition, he alleged that he had lacked a domestic remedy to deal with his complaints concerning the aforementioned measures taken against him.

Josep Casadevall, P
41040/11 – Chamber Judgment, [2015] ECHR 10
Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights 3 5 13

Human Rights, Police

Updated: 25 December 2021; Ref: scu.541372

Exit mobile version