References: Unreported, December 7, 1990
Coram: Millett J
It was alleged that a Mr Guerin had committed a fraud on the arms manufacturer Ferrari.
Held: The constructive trust provision in RSC Order 11, r 1(1)(t) applied only if all the acts necessary to impose liability were committed in England, and that accordingly it applied to knowing participation by acts in a fraudulent breach of trust committed in England, but not to a knowing receipt abroad of the proceeds of such fraud. The rules allowing service out of the jurisdiction where the defendant’s alleged liability arose ‘out of acts committed, whether by him or otherwise, within the jurisdiction’ only applied if all the acts necessary to impose liability were committed in England, and that accordingly it applied to knowing participation by acts in a fraudulent breach of trust committed in England, but not to knowing receipt abroad of the proceeds of such a fraud.
Statutes: Rules of the Supreme Court Order 11 r1(1)(t)
This case is cited by:
- Cited – Islamic Republic of Pakistan -v- Zardari and others ComC (Bailii, [2006] EWHC 2411 (Comm))
The claimant alleged that the defendants had funded the purchase of various properties by secret and unlawful commissions taken by them whilst in power in Pakistan. They sought to recover the proceeds. They now sought permission to serve proceedings . .
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 16-Dec-15 Ref: 245213