EAT Sex Discrimination : Direct – Pregnancy and discrimination
In respect of pregnancy and maternity discrimination the Employment Tribunal did not apply the correct legal test. Onu v Akwiku [2014] ICR 571 and Johal v Commissioner for Equality and Human Rights [2010] UKEAT/0541/09 (HHJ Peter Clark) applied. Questions of pregnancy and maternity discrimination and associated time issues remitted to the same Employment Tribunal. In other respects, including issues relating to sex discrimination and compensation, Employment Tribunal’s Judgment and Reasons upheld.
Postscript added to draw to the attention of the parties and the Employment Tribunal on remission the recently reported decision in Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Keohane [2014] Eq LR 386, especially at paragraphs 22-40.
David Richardson HHJ
[2014] UKEAT 0020 – 14 – 1007
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – The Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis v Keohane EAT 4-Mar-2014
EAT PREGNANCY AND DISCRIMINATION
An Employment Tribunal found that a Police dog handler, one of whose two narcotics Police dogs was removed from her when she told the force she was pregnant, had suffered a . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment, Discrimination
Updated: 20 December 2021; Ref: scu.536439