Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Violation of Art. 10; Violation of Art. 6-1 (independent and impartial tribunal); Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1; Not necessary to examine Art. 14+6-1; Pecuniary damage – claim rejected; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and expenses partial award – Convention proceedings
[1998] ECHR 48, 22678/93
Worldlii, Bailii
Human Rights
Cited by:
Cited – Barclay and Others, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice and others CA 2-Dec-2008
barclay_ssjCA2008
The claimant appealed against refusal of his challenge to the new constitutional law for Sark, and sought a declaration of incompatibility under the 1998 Act. He said that by restricting the people who could stand for election, a free democracy had . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 06 September 2021; Ref: scu.165625 br>