References: Times 10-Apr-1997, (1998) 1 BCLC 485
Coram: David Young QC
The applicants sought leave to proceed in actions against the defendants against whom bankruptcy proceedings were pending. Consnet should have been obtained before proceedings were issued, but application was now made nunc pro tunc.
Held: The court has a free hand in these situations to do what was right and fair. Leave was granted.
Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 285(3)
This case cites:
- See also – Scotlife Home Loans (No 2) Limited -v- Melinek and Melinek CA (Bailii, [1997] EWCA Civ 2335)
The second defendant sought leave to appeal against a possession order obtained by the claimant. The loan obtained had been misapplied by the first defendant, her husband. She had been advised in the transaction by his partner in their solicitors’ . .
This case is cited by:
- See also – Scotlife Home Loans (No 2) Limited -v- Melinek and Melinek CA (Bailii, [1997] EWCA Civ 2335)
The second defendant sought leave to appeal against a possession order obtained by the claimant. The loan obtained had been misapplied by the first defendant, her husband. She had been advised in the transaction by his partner in their solicitors’ . .