In re Lloyds Bank Ltd, Bomze v Bomze: 1931

Where there is evidence that a husband has taken unfair advantage of his influence over his wife, or her confidence in him, ‘it is not difficult for the wife to establish her title to relief.’
Maugham J
[1931] 1 Ch 289
Cited by:

  • Cited – Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (No 2); Barclays Bank plc v Harris; Midland Bank plc v Wallace, etc HL 11-Oct-2001
    Wives had charged the family homes to secure their husband’s business borrowings, and now resisted possession orders, claiming undue influence.
    Held: Undue influence is an equitable protection created to undo the effect of excess influence of . .
    Times 17-Oct-01, [2001] UKHL 44, [2001] 3 WLR 1021, [2002] 2 AC 773, [2002] HLR 4, [2002] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 343, [2001] NPC 147, [2001] Fam Law 880, [2001] 43 EGCS 184, [2001] 2 All ER (Comm) 1061, [2001] 4 All ER 449, [2001] 2 FLR 1364, [2002] 1 P and CR DG14, [2001] 3 FCR 481

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 10 December 2020; Ref: scu.224816