The solicitor had engaged to indemnify the plaintiff against the costs of a ‘doubtful suit’ which failed. Lord Hatherley LC said that he thought it the duty of the Court to be anxious to see that solicitors not only performed their duty towards their own clients but also towards all those against whom they were concerned: ‘The view of the court is, that when a solicitor takes upon himself the conduct of a suit by saying that he will indemnify his client against all costs – where the plaintiff is a mere puppet, and the real party suing is the solicitor – the court will hold the solicitor liable for all the expenses to which he has put the other parties by his conduct.’
Lord Hatherley Lc
(1870) LR 6 Ch 497
England and Wales
Cited – Coondoo v Mookerjee 1876
The award of costs in In re Jones was based on the court’s disciplinary jurisdiction over solicitors . .
Cited – Travelers Insurance Company Ltd v XYZ SC 30-Oct-2019
Challenge to the making of a non-party costs order under section 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 against the product liability insurer of one of the defendants in litigation being managed under a Group Litigation Order (‘GLO’). Many of the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Legal Professions, Costs
Updated: 04 May 2022; Ref: scu.676822