Waite owed money and guaranteed a debt before being made bankrupt. Waite and his trustee were not for this purpose the same person. Waite had held his assets for his own benefit. The trustee paid the debt.
Held: The trustee held the assets that vested in him for the benefit of the creditors: ‘There was in fact no mutuality at the date of the receiving order in Waite’s bankruptcy and the debt on which the action was founded was not due to Waite but to his trustee.’
Judges:
Danckwerts J, Harman J
Citations:
[1956] 1 WLR 480
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Appealed to – In re A Debtor (No 66 of 1955), Ex parte The Debtor v Trustee of Waite (A Bankrupt) CA 2-Jan-1956
Waite owed the debtor andpound;101 for goods sold and delivered. He was bankrupted, having previously guaranteed the debtor’s overdraft and deposited the deeds of his property as security. Waite’s trustee paid the bank andpound;133 out of the . .
Cited by:
Appeal from – In re A Debtor (No 66 of 1955), Ex parte The Debtor v Trustee of Waite (A Bankrupt) CA 2-Jan-1956
Waite owed the debtor andpound;101 for goods sold and delivered. He was bankrupted, having previously guaranteed the debtor’s overdraft and deposited the deeds of his property as security. Waite’s trustee paid the bank andpound;133 out of the . .
Cited – Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Frid HL 13-May-2004
The company went into insolvent liquidation. The secretary of state was to make payments to employees and there were other state preferential creditors. At the same time a refund of VAT was due from the Commissioners of customs and Excise.
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Insolvency
Updated: 05 June 2022; Ref: scu.196880