‘The grounds contend that the Judge erred in considering the position of the Appellant’s 9 month British citizen child, born between the date of the refusal and the date of the hearing. While it is unclear whether the Home Office policy set out at page 3 of the grounds was brought to the judge’s attention by the Appellant representative at the hearing, the failure to have regard to it in the decision renders the grounds arguable.’
Citations:
[2018] UKAITUR IA311532015
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Immigration
Updated: 31 January 2022; Ref: scu.603036