O’Ryan DUTJ
[2016] UKAITUR IA307162014
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
Explained – ex parte Gondolia 1991
In dismissing the claimant’s application for judicial review, Henry J held: ‘Secondly, it is said, and again correctly, that there is no mention in the adjudicator’s determination and reasons that the initiative for the first introduction of the . .
Cited by:
Approved – AA069062014 and Others AIT 30-Aug-2017
Several appellants, all from the same judge, complained of his handling of their cases.
Held: The complaints about the decisions were entirely well-founded: ‘Nobody reading them could detect how the judge reached the conclusion he did, acting . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 07 October 2021; Ref: scu.571717 br>